Teams

Silberman-We are Family

2025 One Doubles-Winter · 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-11vs SWW-CoovertLost 01
L#1 DoublesOliver Silberman / Austin Kingman vs Chris Coovert / Hugh Vicente - (DQ)6-7, 5-7
L#1 DoublesDaniel Silberman / Jeff Boyden vs Anthony Jackson / Terry Pawlitschek5-7, 4-6
2025-03-03vs SWW-ItchonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Silberman / Oliver Silberman vs Benton Huang / Carlo Itchon5-7, 0-6
2025-02-26vs Song/ChoiLost 01
L#1 DoublesOliver Silberman / Daniel Silberman vs James Han / Jaekyung Song1-6, 2-6
2025-02-07vs Kradjan-One Doubles W2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Silberman / Oliver Silberman vs Christopher Kradjan / Brady Miller1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Itchon4242541
2Song/Choi4242546
3Schoeff4242652
4Jackson/Pawlitschek-Super Smash Bros2424966
5Cuevas-TLTC Juggernauts1111216
6Kradjan-One Doubles W202516161272
7Silberman-We are Family05051065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Austin Kingman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniel Silberman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Oliver Silberman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Jeff Boyden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Boyden + Daniel Silberman6261% games+11.8% vs expected
Oliver Silberman + Daniel Silberman2543% games−0.4% vs expected
Oliver Silberman + Austin Kingman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Austin Kingman
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Silberman
43W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Oliver Silberman
32W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Jeff Boyden
25W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.