Teams

Gunther/Fayetteville/FAC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-12vs Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrittany Adair vs Amy Colucci1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCarolina Gomez vs Angela Palladino6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesChristy Haggard vs Maya Kushmaul6-7, 1-6
2025-01-12vs Sahu/Springdale/SRCWon 21
L#1 SinglesBrittany Adair vs Megan Sahu4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAmanda Gunther vs Tia Greaser6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMadeleine Stallbaumer vs Jamie Killingsworth2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-05vs Neal/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrittany Adair vs Gabriela Bottger0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCezanne Garlinghouse vs Piper Anderson0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAmanda Gunther vs Julie Ralston1-6, 1-6
2024-12-02vs Neal/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesCarolina Gomez vs Gabriela Bottger1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBrittany Adair vs Jackie Vermillion3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesLauren McClure vs Kara Briggs3-6, 4-6
2024-11-25vs Trout/Bentonville/KTCLost 03
L#1 SinglesAmanda Gunther vs Maria Pearson5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSherry Lux vs Tracy Liipfert4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesCezanne Garlinghouse vs Isabel Lane1-6, 3-6
2024-11-16vs Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesChristy Haggard vs Angela Palladino6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMadeleine Stallbaumer vs Samantha Gagliardo1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAmanda Gunther vs Maya Kushmaul6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Sherry Lux
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.87
Carolina Gomez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.74
Brittany Adair
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.68
Christy Haggard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.50
Amanda Gunther
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.32
Cezanne Garlinghouse
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Lauren McClure
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Madeleine Stallbaumer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Lux + Carolina Gomez8163% games+6.0% vs expected
Brittany Adair + Cezanne Garlinghouse1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherry Lux
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Carolina Gomez
15W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Brittany Adair
21W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Christy Haggard
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Amanda Gunther
5W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.50
3
Cezanne Garlinghouse
11W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.32
Lauren McClure
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Madeleine Stallbaumer
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.