Teams

LLW - Bake - Team Chen

2022 Tri-Level Doubles - Bakersfield · 3.5 -4.5 Women - Bake

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-25vs Bake - Team SaldivarWon 10
W#3 DoublesLinette Holliday / Mary Wilkening vs Rebecca Badgett / Agnes DeJong6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-13vs Bake - Team SaldivarWon 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Mary Wilkening vs Christine Saldivar / Susan Frakes7-5, 6-3
2022-09-03vs Bake - Team SaldivarWon 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Heather Blue vs Rebecca Badgett / Christine Saldivar6-4, 6-2
2022-08-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Rhonda Slegers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-21vs Bake - Team SaldivarWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Wilkening / Lauren Eittreim vs Agnes DeJong / Rebecca Badgett7-5, 6-4
2022-08-12vs Bake - Team SaldivarLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinette Holliday / Lauren Eittreim vs Susan Frakes / Michele Buoni5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-08-06vs Bake - Team SaldivarLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinette Holliday / Heather Blue vs Christine Saldivar / Rebecca Badgett6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 -4.5 Women - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Kellie Dibble
published
4.27
Eileen Lua
published 4.5
3.91
Liza Chen
published
3.84
Cindy Broussard
published 4.5
3.83
Heather Tkac
published 4
3.80
Nikki Hiebert
published
3.77
Beth van Voorhis
published 4
3.66
Lauren Eittreim
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.35
Rhonda Slegers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Linette Holliday
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Svetlana Sharp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Slegers + Linette Holliday5350% gamesnot enough data
Linette Holliday + Lauren Eittreim3265% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kellie Dibble
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Eileen Lua
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
Liza Chen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.91
4.5
Cindy Broussard
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
Heather Tkac
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Nikki Hiebert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Beth van Voorhis
39W–22L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Lauren Eittreim
57W–11L career · 9 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Rhonda Slegers
54W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Linette Holliday
118W–107L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Svetlana Sharp
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.