Teams

Team 1

2023 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-15vs Team 3 Morning SetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathryn Rigney / Teresa Wallendjack vs Noriko Hoffman / Theresa Connolly7-6, 5-1
2023-06-13vs Team 2 Downton AlleyWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathryn Rigney / Teresa Wallendjack vs Linda Bhangdia / Kate Putt6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKay Bransford / Joanne Marshall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-01Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarion Dearth / Susan Holberger vs Lea Hedquist / Tamara Savage6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathryn Rigney / Teresa Wallendjack vs Donna Lee / Virginia Shames6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-30vs Team 4 Mature SwingersWon 20
W#1 DoublesKay Bransford / Joanne Marshall vs Jennifer East / Sharon Tompkins6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarion Dearth / Rachel Fritz vs Allison Broadbent / Linda Pongsugree6-2, 6-3
2023-05-25vs Team 3 Morning SetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarion Dearth / Kerry Murray vs Spoorti Dandridge / Miyoko Kamei6-2, 5-5
2023-05-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarion Dearth / Linda Walsh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-19vs Team 4 Mature SwingersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKathryn Rigney / Teresa Wallendjack vs Jeanne Baily / Jill Poretz4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarion Dearth / Kerry Murray vs Polly Middleton / Jennifer East6-4, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Kathryn Rigney
published
3.74
Kay Bransford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Marion Dearth
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Peg Blomme
published 4
3.31
Alice Edmondson
published 3.5
3.01
Teresa Wallendjack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kerry Murray
published
Linda Walsh
published
Susan Holberger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marion Dearth + Alice Edmondson2341% gamesnot enough data
Kay Bransford + Teresa Wallendjack033 matchesnot enough data
Linda Walsh + Teresa Wallendjack123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Rigney
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4
Kay Bransford
304W–204L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Marion Dearth
56W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Peg Blomme
14W–26L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Alice Edmondson
22W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Teresa Wallendjack
63W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Kerry Murray
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Walsh
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Holberger
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.