Teams

SIERRA VIEW CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-06vs RIO DEL ORO CW7.5BLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Fingado / Rosalie Calabrese vs Raffaella Anderson / Grace Kwon4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Winter / Laureen Kouba vs Kathleen Chambers / Nora Nachtsheim3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Sorgea / Tamara Jerd vs Stephanie Kuroda / Shelley Orluck6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-22vs BROADSTONE RC CW7.5CWon 21
L#1 DoublesWanda Hasadsri / Rosalie Calabrese vs Stacey Matteoli / Maggie Mei Choy2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Winter / Pamela Todd-Johnson vs Brianna Schneider / Christina Charn6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Sorgea / Kathi Peterson vs Barbara van Fleet / Denise Chisick6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Laura Newby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Angela Mabe
published 4
3.72
Hong Manh
published 4
3.67
Laura Sorgea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Wanda Hasadsri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Cheryl Winter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Amanda Fingado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Laureen Kouba
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Pamela Todd-Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Kathi Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Rosalie Calabrese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alissa Faith
published 3.5
3.20
Tamara Jerd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Janna French
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosalie Calabrese + Kathi Peterson5550% games+1.1% vs expected
Amanda Fingado + Laura Sorgea123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Newby
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Angela Mabe
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Hong Manh
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Laura Sorgea
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Wanda Hasadsri
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Cheryl Winter
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Amanda Fingado
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Laureen Kouba
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.60
Pamela Todd-Johnson
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kathi Peterson
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Rosalie Calabrese
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alissa Faith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tamara Jerd
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Janna French
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.