Teams

SD 3.0 Coronado Cays/ Anderson

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 2.70 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · SD - Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 3.0 La Jolla TC/ Salyards000000
2SD 3.0 Mtn View/ Tomita000000
3SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Evans000000
4SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Swirhun000000
5SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Giacalone000000
6SD 3.0 Coronado Cays/ Anderson000000
7SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Vermehren000000
8SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Morton000000
9SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Escobedo000000
10SD 3.0 Balboa TC/ Labarre000000
11SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Holzer000000
12SD 3.0 Mtn View/ Blancarte000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Krysta McRae
published
2.85
2.67
Cory Stege
published 3
2.55
Lyle Anderson
published
2.43
Leslie Vinton
published
2.36
Michelle Huber
published
2.32
Elizabeth Riebe
published 2.5
2.30
Giovanna Jimenez
published 2.5
2.20
Hiroyo Poland
published 2.5
Meagan McCreery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyle Anderson + Cory Stege123 matchesnot enough data
Cory Stege + Krysta McRae303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krysta McRae
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Gabrielle Canonizado
13W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Cory Stege
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Lyle Anderson
5W–13L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Leslie Vinton
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.43
Michelle Huber
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.36
2.5
Elizabeth Riebe
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Giovanna Jimenez
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Hiroyo Poland
6W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Meagan McCreery
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.