Teams

AG RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-15vs RVR REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesGay Wisch / Barbara Sport vs Brooke Stott / Michelle Bevington1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNicole McDermott vs Morgan Warth6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesArlene Goetz / Pamela Niro vs Liza Henry / Anne Goldberg3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Glen / Carolyn Hayes vs Karen Fullerton / Jessica Owings6-1, 6-4
2026-07-08vs SMGLR REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Glen / Arlene Goetz vs Vanessa Adam / Darcy Conover4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNicole McDermott vs Hilary McKie3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Huntsman / Pamela Niro vs Jackie Kaplan / Mardell Burkholder6-2, 6-2
2026-07-01vs CROWN PINKLost 13
L#1 DoublesGay Wisch / Beth Simonetti vs Wendy Ferrara / Stephanie Hayes0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNicole McDermott vs Amy Daniel2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Murphy / Linda Huntsman vs Richlyn Pavcek / Diana Ray7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPamela Niro / Jennifer Parker vs Colleen Barill / Lara Horst4-6, 1-6
2026-06-29vs GSCC PURPLESplit 22
L#1 DoublesGay Wisch / Beth Simonetti vs Anna Lorenson / Susie Demers0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNicole McDermott vs Brittany Shintaku7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Glen / Linda Huntsman vs Emelie Piper / Courtney Little2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesClaire Green / Barbara Sport vs Melody Morris / Martha Schanfarber6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Mary Jo Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Linda Huntsman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Julie Glen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Arlene Goetz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Claire Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Gay Wisch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Carolyn Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Nicole McDermott
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.60
Pamela Niro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Barbara Sport
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.07
Beth Simonetti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arlene Goetz + Mary Jo Murphy3352% games+6.2% vs expected
Carolyn Hayes + Gay Wisch5358% games+4.5% vs expected
Linda Huntsman + Gay Wisch2446% games+1.4% vs expected
Claire Green + Barbara Sport1536% games−5.0% vs expected
Arlene Goetz + Pamela Niro1446% games−5.7% vs expected
Barbara Sport + Gay Wisch1432% games−14.4% vs expected
Claire Green + Linda Huntsman5255% gamesnot enough data
Claire Green + Gay Wisch1635% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jo Murphy
21W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Linda Huntsman
18W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Julie Glen
16W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Arlene Goetz
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Claire Green
15W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Gay Wisch
23W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Carolyn Hayes
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
Nicole McDermott
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.62
Pamela Niro
24W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Barbara Sport
6W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Beth Simonetti
0W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Jennifer Parker
4W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.