Teams

Aur/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-16vs Pedro/MemphisWon 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Meagle / Andrew Williamson vs Jared Roaten / Edward Friedman7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Martin / Alex Boggs vs Bobby Hoang / Steven Ling2-6, 4-6
2025-11-02vs Bray/MemphisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJared Smith / William Ogles vs David Bray / Matthew Davidoff6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJonathan Aur / Andrew Williamson vs Christopher Heimann / Robert O'Bryan5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-11-01vs Galdieri/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Ogles / Jared Smith vs Jacob Monteverde / Hunter Hataway1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatt Moss vs Mike Galdieri2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTim Martin / John Kingsley vs Brice Bailey / David Patterson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-22vs Bray/MemphisLost 02
L#1 SinglesWilliam Ogles vs Brad Swanson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Kingsley / Andrew Williamson vs David Bray / Adam Bratton6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-19vs Cunningham/MemphisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJared Smith / William Ogles vs Chris Lenegar / Alexander Folk6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMatt Moss vs Andre Hitchcock3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-05vs Eason/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesFord Aur / William Ogles vs Walter Hoehn / Joseph Battaile3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMatt Moss vs Joseph Koelsch3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Williamson / Tim Martin vs Jerry Gilless / Elliott Dent3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Coleman/MemphisWon 20
W#2 SinglesMatt Moss vs Daniel Schlais6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAndrew Williamson / Lynn Shaw vs Louis Connelly / William Smith6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bray/Memphis7131929298
2Day/Memphis62271329286
3Heard/Memphis62231742332
4Pedro/Memphis53271329283
5Takahashi/Memphis44221840351
6Miller/Memphis44211942355
7Eason/Memphis44172348351
8Coleman/Memphis26172349386
9Bay/Memphis26182250376
10Cunningham/Memphis26132757400
11Aur/Memphis26112961408
12Herren/Memphis1763469452

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Andrew Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Matt Moss
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.65
William Ogles
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.34
Tim Martin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Taylor Bobo
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrew Williamson
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Matt Moss
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
William Ogles
6W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Tim Martin
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Taylor Bobo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.