Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Smith)(CCC)

SouthernNewMexico · 2023 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.43 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2023 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Enrique Mata
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Danny Nassar
published 3.5
David Gagne
published 3.5
Jacques McNeil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Alejandro Orozco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Eddie Nassar
published 3.5
2.66
Craig Fortune
published 3
Jaime Lowenberg
published
Jorge Kareh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Juan Acevedo
published
Octavio Corral
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Richard Mason
published
Ruben Ramirez
published
Shady Elias
published
Stephane Martel
published
Tito Herrera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephane Martel + Richard Mason4258% games+12.7% vs expected
Juan Acevedo + Enrique Mata71147% games+10.0% vs expected
Ruben Ramirez + Jorge Kareh4545% games+1.5% vs expected
Craig Fortune + Eddie Nassar0640% games−6.4% vs expected
Eddie Nassar + Danny Nassar2539% games−13.3% vs expected
Eddie Nassar + Stephane Martel8846% gamesnot enough data
Danny Nassar + Stephane Martel2647% gamesnot enough data
Eddie Nassar + Tito Herrera2447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Enrique Mata
58W–110L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Danny Nassar
19W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
David Gagne
24W–40L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Jacques McNeil
8W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Alejandro Orozco
23W–40L career · 1 line in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Eddie Nassar
38W–61L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Craig Fortune
25W–62L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
Jaime Lowenberg
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jorge Kareh
74W–111L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Juan Acevedo
52W–84L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Octavio Corral
32W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Richard Mason
18W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruben Ramirez
31W–49L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shady Elias
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephane Martel
49W–87L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tito Herrera
15W–51L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.