Teams

Coleman/Bemis/MH/LR&F

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-02vs Hudson/StuttgartWon 31
W#1 DoublesTera Moore / Marsha Partney vs Amy Johnson / Lisa Pierce4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLeeann Hutson vs Elizabeth Mulloy1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Byrd / Stephanie Hughes vs Connie Hudson / Melinda Hopson6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSammie Smith / Sarah Blagg vs Elizabeth Hoskyn / Erin Oliver6-1, 6-1
2026-05-02vs Hudson/StuttgartSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMargaret Byrd / Sarah Blagg vs Lisa Pierce / Amy Johnson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTera Moore vs Elizabeth Mulloy3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hughes / Sammie Smith vs Connie Hudson / Melinda Hopson3-6, 5-5
W#3 DoublesMarsha Partney / Leeann Hutson vs Elizabeth Hoskyn / Erin Oliver6-2, 7-5
2026-04-18vs Hudson/StuttgartWon 31
W#1 DoublesJillian Bemis / Jennifer Houghtaling vs Lisa Pierce / Amy Johnson6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMargaret Byrd / Cara Coleman vs Elizabeth Mulloy / Melinda Hopson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Kelley / Leeann Hutson vs Erin Oliver / Elizabeth Hoskyn6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesSammie Smith / Stephanie Hughes vs Greta Lindsey / DeAnne Dickson6-2, 6-3
2026-04-18vs Hudson/StuttgartWon 31
W#1 DoublesMargaret Byrd / Jennifer Houghtaling vs Connie Hudson / Amy Johnson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJillian Bemis / Cara Coleman vs DeAnne Dickson / Greta Lindsey6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLeeann Hutson / Sammie Smith vs Elizabeth Mulloy / Melinda Hopson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#4 DoublesStephanie Hughes / Carolyn Kelley vs Elizabeth Hoskyn / Erin Oliver6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Coleman/Bemis/MH/LR&F4015511123
2Hudson/Stuttgart0451532217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Jennifer Houghtaling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Sarah Blagg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Marsha Partney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Jillian Bemis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Margaret Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Carolyn Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Cara Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Sammie Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Stephanie Hughes
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Leeann Hutson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Tera Moore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Houghtaling + Margaret Byrd5062% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Kelley + Jennifer Houghtaling404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Houghtaling
12W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
Sarah Blagg
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Marsha Partney
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Jillian Bemis
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Margaret Byrd
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Carolyn Kelley
11W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Cara Coleman
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Sammie Smith
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Stephanie Hughes
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Leeann Hutson
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Tera Moore
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.