Teams

Payne Park Nelson

2022 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 W Saturday

8 players · average NTRP 4.30 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-26vs Englewood PattersonLost 02
L#2 DoublesColleen Sims / Lisa Klemeyer vs Ann Pfister-Brown / Maureen Rasp-Glose6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Park / Wendy Hillock vs Joan Patterson / Audrey Cohn6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-19vs Longwood WilsonLost 12
W#1 SinglesCindy Fancher vs Dana Noecker6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTanya Kelly / Debbie Crowley vs Mary Wilson / Susan Gammon3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesColleen Sims / Lisa Klemeyer vs Susan Marro / Elizabeth Warrier7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-12vs Sarasota - Payne in the ButtsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCindy Fancher vs Courtney Rosenthal6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDeanna Castro / Wendy Hillock vs Elizabeth Green / Susan Kimball2-6, 3-6
2022-02-26vs Englewood PattersonWon 10
W#3 DoublesColleen Sims / Tanya Kelly vs Audrey Cohn / Maureen Rasp-Glose6-3, 6-4
2022-02-19vs River Strand AriiLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Price / Wendy Hillock vs Joan Pennello / Denise Holland2-6, 4-6
2022-02-12vs Longwood WilsonLost 12
W#2 DoublesDeanna Castro / Wendy Hillock vs Amy Harper / Susan Marro4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCindy Fancher vs Sally Alford7-5, 4-3
L#3 DoublesColleen Sims / Lisa Klemeyer vs Lynn Deuitch / Donna Mink4-6, 5-7
2022-02-05vs Sarasota - Payne in the ButtsWon 10
W#1 SinglesCindy Fancher vs Tanya Keith6-0, 7-5
2022-01-15vs River Strand AriiSplit 11
W#2 SinglesCindy Fancher vs Tie Mccullough6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDeanna Castro / Wendy Hillock vs Heather Roggendorf / Denise Holland1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Colleen Sims
published 4.5
4.24
Cindy Fancher
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.03
Michele Rose
published
3.95
Wendy Hillock
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
Debbie Crowley
published 4
3.75
Lisa Klemeyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Maria Dull
published
Tanya Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Klemeyer + Tanya Kelly231257% games+0.7% vs expected
Wendy Hillock + Cindy Fancher5157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colleen Sims
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Cindy Fancher
68W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
Michele Rose
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
4.03
4.5
Wendy Hillock
92W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.95
4
Debbie Crowley
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Lisa Klemeyer
54W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Maria Dull
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tanya Kelly
65W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.