Teams

UPTA18F/Mollenkamp/Sportsclub

2024 Fall 18 & Over-Men-UPTA · 4.0 Men FF

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-02vs UPTA18F/Friedman/KrocWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdam Thompson / Terry Kent vs Brian Dabney / Rob Rogers7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNoah Bellhorn vs Brian Friedman7-5, 3-2
2024-10-19vs UPTA18F/Friedman/KrocWon 20
W#1 DoublesJon Shinpoch / Harvinder Sidhu vs Brian Dabney / Chris Helms6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAndrew Lewis vs Brian Friedman6-3, 6-0
2024-10-15vs UPTA18F/Friedman/KrocWon 21
L#1 DoublesDillon Monday / Conor Caffrey vs Rick McWhorter / Chris Helms2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesGarret Conover vs Brian Friedman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNils Mollenkamp / Harvinder Sidhu vs Scott Dickey / Rob Rogers6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Harvinder Sidhu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Garret Conover
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.33
Andrew Lewis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Dillon Monday
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Nils Mollenkamp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Conor Caffrey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Jon Shinpoch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Terry Kent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Noah Bellhorn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dillon Monday + Jon Shinpoch1447% gamesnot enough data
Nils Mollenkamp + Garret Conover314 matchesnot enough data
Terry Kent + Noah Bellhorn134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Harvinder Sidhu
48W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
Garret Conover
26W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
3.5
Andrew Lewis
27W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dillon Monday
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
Nils Mollenkamp
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.27
3.5
Conor Caffrey
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jon Shinpoch
25W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.22
Terry Kent
13W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Noah Bellhorn
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.