Teams

KY/BG/STOBAUGH

COMBO 40 & OVER · 6.5 WOMEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-14vs KY/OWB/RICHESONWon 20
W#1 DoublesPenney Baseheart / Beckie Stobaugh vs Linda Richeson / Cindy Thompson8-2
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Napier / Kay Faesel vs Carrie Boswell / Kim Osborne8-0
2024-09-14vs KY/OWB/RICHESONWon 21
W#1 DoublesApril Harris / Penney Baseheart vs Linda Richeson / Kim Osborne8-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Donley / Tricia Sanders vs Carrie Boswell / Robyn Conkright8-2
L#3 DoublesTammy Salada / Beckie Stobaugh vs Gail Kirkland / Cindy Thompson4-2
2024-09-14vs KY/OWB/RICHESONWon 20
W#1 DoublesKara Compton / Jessica Owsley vs Linda Richeson / Robyn Conkright8-4
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Napier / Heather Wise vs Carrie Boswell / Cindy Thompson8-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Kara Compton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Penney Baseheart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Charlotte Napier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Melissa Marr
published
3.30
Tricia Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Kathy Donley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Tammy Salada
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Cheryl Hensel
published 3
3.01
Beckie Stobaugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Kay Faesel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Marr + Penney Baseheart404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kara Compton
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
Penney Baseheart
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Charlotte Napier
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Melissa Marr
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Tricia Sanders
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Kathy Donley
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Tammy Salada
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Cheryl Hensel
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
3.5
Beckie Stobaugh
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Kay Faesel
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.