Teams

Smith - Serves You Right (RCC)

2026 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-01vs Wooten - Love AllWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeanne Smith / Natalia Simek vs Melinda McGowan / Julia Schneider6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKristin DeMasi vs Lindsay Fox6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Volk-Fortier / Stefanie Benson vs Amber Wooten / Jennifer Reeves2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-29vs McDonaldWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarthina Marple / Karen Triplett vs Tamara Hurney / Tami Rekas6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNatalia Simek vs Krista Magalhaes6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Chang / Amanda Klukowski vs Shelli Burnham / Dynne Sung7-6, 7-5
2026-05-18vs McDonaldLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarianne Moore / Leanne Smith vs Britney Beauchemin / Dynne Sung2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Barr vs Rachael Georgopoulos1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Chang / Jecholia Jessee vs Rebecca McDonald / Ella Rash7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-08vs Wooten - Love AllWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Triplett / Jecholia Jessee vs Denise Guthrie / Lindsay Fox4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristin DeMasi vs Courtney Pechie5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStefanie Benson / Jennifer Volk-Fortier vs Tina Stroupe / Melinda McGowan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-27vs McDonaldWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarianne Moore / Patti Klein vs Lisa Charucksiri / Vanessa Moore6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristie FitzGerald vs Ella Rash2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Seegers / Jennifer Chang vs Rebecca McDonald / Laura Faraji7-5, 6-2
2026-04-24vs Wooten - Love AllWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarianne Moore / Patti Klein vs Melinda McGowan / Tina Stroupe6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristie FitzGerald vs Joy Gonia1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Seegers / Jennifer Chang vs Maureen Spaseff / Kashema Wharton6-0, 6-1
2026-04-13vs McDonaldWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarianne Moore / Natalia Simek vs Tambre Fetzner / Tamara Hurney6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Britney Beauchemin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Seegers / Leanne Smith vs Laura Faraji / Rebecca McDonald6-1, 6-3
2026-04-06vs Wooten - Love AllWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatti Klein / Natalia Simek vs Amber Wooten / Frankie Smith6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKristin DeMasi vs Andrea Haufler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Klukowski / Karen Triplett vs Melinda McGowan / Maureen Spaseff6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith - Serves You Right (RCC)7116821193
2McDonald44121225202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Natalia Simek
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Leanne Smith
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
2.39
Elizabeth Seegers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Carthina Marple
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.29
Karen Triplett
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.28
Patti Klein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Barr
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Amanda Klukowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Kristin DeMasi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.18
Jennifer Volk-Fortier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Jecholia Jessee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.15
Jennifer Chang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.94
Christie FitzGerald
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Triplett + Jecholia Jessee4158% gamesnot enough data
Karen Triplett + Kristin DeMasi303 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Smith + Natalia Simek303 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Klukowski + Jennifer Chang213 matchesnot enough data
Kristin DeMasi + Jennifer Chang033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalia Simek
24W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Leanne Smith
9W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.45
2.5
Elizabeth Seegers
7W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Carthina Marple
50W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.39
Karen Triplett
16W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
Patti Klein
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Andrea Barr
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Klukowski
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Kristin DeMasi
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Jennifer Volk-Fortier
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Jecholia Jessee
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Jennifer Chang
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Christie FitzGerald
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.