← Teams

LOTC-Lavios/Vargas

2019 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kristi Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
—
Alan Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Julie Hester
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Kristen Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Danny Denning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Rich Rice
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.33
Michael Lavios
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2019-03-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKristen Fisher / Adam Silverblatt vs Cathy Gatzke / Jeff Wheeler6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / John St Claire vs Juan Li / Deepak Selvanathan6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHeather Dudley / Michael Lavios vs Sydney Taggart / Shawn Boyce6-4, 6-3
2019-03-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesBrenda Falson / Michael Lavios vs Zachary Kinavey / Carrie Engle3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Alan Kaplan vs Adam Gamboa / Mary Klinger6-3, 6-1
2019-03-02Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesDouglas Siegler / Julie Hester vs Dan Boren / Jill Sather3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Lavios / Kristin Lyman vs Jason Dortch / Julie Brown7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2019-02-23Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesJohn St Claire / Kathleen Budnick vs Kay Dobashi / Donovan Oliver6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrenda Falson / Danny Denning vs Nate Look / Jennifer Richman7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2019-02-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBrenda Falson / Danny Denning vs Neil Soiffer / Dongju Won3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-02-09Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAlan Kaplan / Heather Dudley vs Jeff Berman / Heather Watkins6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRich Rice / Kristi Vargas vs Julie Atchley / Tyler Shoemaker6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Lavios / Julie Hester vs Mandeev Brar / Krista Mikalatos6-4, 6-0
2019-02-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSherri Sacconaghi / Rich Rice vs Kim Wright / Damon Ogden6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKristen Fisher / Danny Denning vs Linda Lovett / Joe Conyard3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-01-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKristi Vargas / Michael Lavios vs Craig Koessler / Patricia Sturr7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Danny Denning vs Tony Moreno / Roxanne Imbrie7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Hester / Alan Kaplan vs Elaine Zevenbergen / Adam Hutchinson6-3, 6-3
2019-01-13Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesDouglas Siegler / Kathleen Budnick vs Christian Walkenhorst / Kathryn Smith6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRich Rice / Sherri Sacconaghi vs Mike Agee / Mamie Gregory6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kristi Vargas
82W–131L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Alan Kaplan
11W–13L career
not enough data
—
4
Julie Hester
9W–25L career · type M
not enough data
—
4
Kristen Fisher
67W–52L career
8%92%0%
3.65
4
Danny Denning
64W–77L career
37%63%0%
3.48
4
Rich Rice
65W–70L career
45%55%0%
3.46
3.5
Michael Lavios
30W–56L career
2%89%8%
3.33
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.