Teams

1/15 Refund

2024 Adult 40 and Over League · Refund

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Refund
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11/15 Refund000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Lloyd Parfait
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Ayelish Kerber
published 3.5
2.84
James Kurzeka
published 3.5
Tamami Tomida
published
Wendell Asuka
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lloyd Parfait
24W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Ayelish Kerber
20W–31L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
James Kurzeka
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.84
Tamami Tomida
25W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendell Asuka
36W–46L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.