Teams

BP/Jones

2025 COTA USTA Adult 18 & Over Men - Spring · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-18vs BP/BameLost 03
L#1 DoublesColin Howe / Alex Bergeron vs Vladimir Reukov / Jeremiah Bame4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesZachary Kulik vs Jason Goddu3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Jones / Steven Niemela vs Josh Chandler / Davd Dorbin2-6, 3-6
2025-03-11vs ATC/SalmonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJason Dalton / Kevin Jones vs William Culpepper / Wendell Beard3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesColin Howe vs Charlie Bauder7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesZachary Kulik / Nick Chaplinski vs John Scott / Scott Dougan7-5, 6-4
2025-02-25vs ATC/BevelsWon 21
L#1 DoublesKevin Jones / Nick Chaplinski vs Andrew Redman / Roger Bevels4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlex Bergeron vs Cam Martin6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesZachary Kulik / Jason Dalton vs Amelito Manuel Andaya / Jeremie Savaiinaea6-2, 6-1
2025-02-18vs BP/BameWon 21
L#1 DoublesJason Dalton / Steven Niemela vs Josh Chandler / Jason Goddu1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAlex Bergeron vs Sean Larsen6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesColin Howe / Nick Chaplinski vs Davd Dorbin / Michael Kulik6-2, 6-1
2025-01-28vs ATC/SalmonWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Bergeron / Colin Howe vs Wendell Beard / Daniel Wychrij7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJason Dalton vs Chad Millard2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesZachary Kulik / Steven Niemela vs Scott Dougan / Charlie Bauder6-4, 6-1
2025-01-24vs ATC/BevelsLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlex Bergeron / Kevin Jones vs Russell Palmer / Andrew Redman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSteven Niemela vs Jianxin Zhao0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesColin Howe / Zachary Kulik vs Vasant Muralidharan / Jeremie Savaiinaea1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ATC/Bevels4211719141
2BP/Jones3381021161
3ATC/Salmon3381023158
4BP/Bame2481022173

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Jason Dalton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.75
Steven Niemela
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Zachary Kulik
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.74
Colin Howe
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
Alex Bergeron
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Nick Chaplinski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Dalton
20W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Steven Niemela
12W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Zachary Kulik
10W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Colin Howe
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Alex Bergeron
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Nick Chaplinski
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.