Teams

GSmith-HR

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-10vs SBurkert-HVCCSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAmy Beth Kessinger vs Amanda Lacoff6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Couto / Mary Feger vs Mollie Williams / Virginia Dirschl2-6, 1-6
2025-04-26vs HRoss-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeth Huebner / Hallie Shinn vs Valerie Acre / Lynsey Easley7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMary Feger vs Amanda Linke2-6, 3-6
2025-04-12vs LBoesch-YMCALost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Couto / Ginny Kirk Andrews vs Leslie Boesch / Julia Howard1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Loeb / Laura Privalle vs Heather Remley / Kamila Korzeniowska1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAmy Beth Kessinger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-05vs JRoss-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarrie Couto / Mary Feger vs Tia Vierling / Sharon Campbell6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAmy Beth Kessinger vs Laura Carlson6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Huebner / Donna Ware vs Hannah Silverstein / Kate Elia4-6, 5-7
2025-03-29vs TWahlstrom-CHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesDonna Bauman / Hallie Shinn vs Leah Weinberger / Allison Graves6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Loeb / Emily Johnson vs Jenny Perry / Nora Lenahan3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Ware / Laura Privalle vs Kristen Fuller / Kimber Barnett2-6, 6-7
2025-03-08vs MPaul-ENOLost 13
W#1 DoublesCarrie Couto / Mary Feger vs JessieAnne D'Amico / Nicole Shifflett6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Beth Kessinger vs Chunyan Xie4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Millholland / Donna Ware vs Emily Childs / Kimberly Patrey0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Loeb / Geraldine Smith vs Elizabeth Harvie / Mary Clare Rosemeyer3-6, 2-6
2025-03-08vs LBoesch-YMCALost 13
L#1 DoublesGinny Kirk Andrews / Alexandra Millholland vs Julia Howard / Tiffany Holbrook0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Ware / Katie Neal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAmy Beth Kessinger vs Lisa Spees1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Couto / Mary Feger vs Leslie Boesch / Paige Lloyd7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-01vs HRoss-ENOLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Ware / Laura Privalle vs Suyeon Kim / Kelsey Kowalski1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Millholland / Carrie Couto vs Barbara Timinskas / Tiffany Langino5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHallie Shinn / Geraldine Smith vs Stacy Rank / Winston Henderson6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Katie Neal
published
4.09
Beth Huebner
published 4
4.07
Amy Beth Kessinger
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.01
Donna Bauman
published
3.96
Mary Feger
usually #1 Singles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Ginny Kirk Andrews
published
3.90
Hallie Shinn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Geraldine Smith
published
3.59
Carrie Couto
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.57
Laura Privalle
published
3.54
Beth Loeb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Jennifer Barrow
published
3.26
Donna Ware
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Alexandra Millholland
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Huebner + Carrie Couto6453% games+8.2% vs expected
Mary Feger + Carrie Couto171354% games+4.1% vs expected
Beth Loeb + Donna Ware31436% games−3.5% vs expected
Mary Feger + Donna Ware3354% gamesnot enough data
Beth Loeb + Laura Privalle134 matchesnot enough data
Donna Ware + Jennifer Barrow224 matchesnot enough data
Katie Neal + Donna Bauman303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Neal + Beth Huebner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Neal
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
4
Beth Huebner
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.09
4.5
Amy Beth Kessinger
82W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
Donna Bauman
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Mary Feger
125W–65L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
Ginny Kirk Andrews
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.92
4.5
Hallie Shinn
150W–110L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
Geraldine Smith
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Carrie Couto
162W–176L career · 13 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Laura Privalle
16W–24L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Beth Loeb
124W–157L career · 6 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Jennifer Barrow
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Donna Ware
100W–185L career · 12 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Alexandra Millholland
53W–103L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.