Teams

Avalon 7.5 Women's Combo - Mihalko

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-15vs SCC Team Citrus - BrunnerBrownSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMeghan Pearsall / Nancy Mihalko vs Suzanne Spiller / Colleen Weisiger2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCaroline Ogilvie / Betsy Siewers vs Allison Krumpe / Carla Shaffer6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-09-14vs ACAC LewisWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Laurie Huizenga vs Beth Vossler / Rebecca Wong6-2, 6-3
2024-09-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Samantha Mier vs Angela Woods / Stephanie Marcus4-6, 4-6
2024-08-31vs ACAC Davis Deuce DynamitesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Laurie Huizenga vs Lara Hansen / Nikki Callaghan7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Caroline Ogilvie vs Jeanette Kim / Karen Stallard6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-25vs Westwood called to serve - SeredniLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrice Shupack / Alice Ulrichs vs Linda Jimenez / Kacie Painter2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-08-17vs ACAC Naylor 7.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesLaurie Huizenga / Kristin Tetterton vs Sarah Estes / Julie Ruth6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKim Schultz / Caroline Ogilvie vs Robin Petrine / Katherine Guerette3-6, 0-6
2024-08-11vs Belmont-MoseleySplit 11
W#2 DoublesLisa Voeks / Kim Schultz vs Elisa Grotjohn / Melissa Allen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Croft-Whelan / Samantha Mier vs Tanisha Moseley / Philathea Cole0-6, 2-6
2024-08-03vs Woodlake-Poindexter/EstesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Kristin Tetterton vs Mary Estes / Elizabeth Hoover6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kristin Tetterton
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.56
Lara Green
published
3.44
Nancy Mihalko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Caroline Ogilvie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Meghan Pearsall
published
3.34
Laurie Huizenga
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Alice Ulrichs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Teresa Lancaster
published
3.23
Betsy Siewers
published 3.5
3.15
Kim Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.83
Samantha Mier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Voeks
published
Renita Randolph
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Mihalko + Kim Schultz7847% games−8.2% vs expected
Samantha Mier + Kim Schultz1635% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Huizenga + Kristin Tetterton5066% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Mihalko + Alice Ulrichs303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristin Tetterton
155W–104L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Lara Green
10W–15L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Nancy Mihalko
182W–108L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Caroline Ogilvie
101W–84L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Meghan Pearsall
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.37
Laurie Huizenga
96W–86L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Alice Ulrichs
86W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Teresa Lancaster
7W–23L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Betsy Siewers
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Kim Schultz
75W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Samantha Mier
32W–87L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
Lisa Voeks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Renita Randolph
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.