Teams

MCTA65/Ceran/RHTC

COMBO 65 & Over · 65 & Over Adult Women - 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 65 & Over Adult Women - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCTA65/Ceran/RHTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Doris Rahman
published 3.5
3.28
Joy Landesman
published
3.20
Mildred Deely
published 3.5
3.20
Pamela Faile
published
3.07
Paula Greiner
published 3.5
3.02
Alberta McCullough
published 3.5
3.01
Karen Davies
published
3.01
Yvonne Ceran
published
2.87
Joanne James
published
2.60
Joanne Ward
published
Renee Martin
published
Sandra Stowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alberta McCullough + Yvonne Ceran134 matchesnot enough data
Doris Rahman + Yvonne Ceran303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Doris Rahman
89W–42L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Joy Landesman
20W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Mildred Deely
79W–102L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Pamela Faile
18W–18L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Paula Greiner
61W–83L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Alberta McCullough
3W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Karen Davies
40W–44L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Yvonne Ceran
23W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Joanne James
26W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Joanne Ward
4W–19L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
Renee Martin
39W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Stowe
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.