Teams

JLTC - Lockhart/Johnson

2026 B'ham Combo - 18 & Over - Weeknight · 5.5 Women - Monday Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-24vs Gardendale - Zassoda/WaldropSplit 11
W#1 DoublesValerie Jeter Campbell / Mary Mullins vs CATHERINE NEELEY / Kimberlly Stringer6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShaunda Kidd / Felicia Carter Johnson vs Maryam Azam / Mallory Martin4-6, 6-7
2026-08-10vs PTCC - Blutter/McMillanWon 21
W#1 DoublesDoris Gaines / Felicia Carter Johnson vs Carlie McMillan / Elisa Nelson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesValerie Jeter Campbell / Mary Mullins vs Margaret Canter / Ashley Bowen6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMya Nathan / Tina Johnson-Wright vs Laura Fleenor / Heather Lebensburher5-7, 3-6
2026-08-03vs West Homewood - Casey/GrangerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Mullins / Valerie Jeter Campbell vs Erica Casey / Allison Granger4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDoris Gaines / Tina Johnson-Wright vs Emily Klein / Morgan Hall5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMya Nathan / Vanessa Ellison vs Anna Boney / Summer Trammell1-6, 3-6
2026-07-27vs Inverness CC - Davis/DieguezLost 12
L#1 DoublesDoris Gaines / Felicia Carter Johnson vs Julianna Vaughn / Lauren Sisler4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMya Nathan / Vanessa Ellison vs Chelsi Davis / Cassidy Birmingham1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShaunda Kidd / Tina Johnson-Wright vs Sarah Beth Clement / Morgan Brown6-2, 6-0
2026-07-20vs VCC - Smith/NeeseLost 03
L#1 DoublesDoris Gaines / Mary Mullins vs Brittany Stegall / Katie Newell2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSonja Smith / LaKenzise Mayberry vs Angela Brown / Kathryn Duett2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMya Nathan / Tina Johnson-Wright vs Mary-Michael Neese / Carissa Hughey1-6, 5-7
2026-07-13vs Riverchase - DaigleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSonja Smith / LaKenzise Mayberry vs Shanette Daigle / Meredith Wiseman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDoris Gaines / Felicia Carter Johnson vs Lark Livingston / Courtney Cornutt4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVanessa Ellison / Mya Nathan vs Beth Lewis / Emily Masters0-6, 0-6
2026-07-06vs HCC - WattsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMya Nathan / Tina Johnson-Wright vs Holly Talley / Ashley McCauley1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesValerie Jeter Campbell / Mary Mullins vs Jade Sipes / Cassidy Dickson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDoris Gaines / Felicia Carter Johnson vs Rachel Angel / Michelle Watts2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 5.5 Women - Monday Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1VCC - Smith/Neese601629130
2West Homewood - Casey/Granger5113510126
3West Homewood - Hancock43111020155
4HCC - Tessin329615132
5HCC - Watts3381023168
6PTCC - Blutter/McMillan1571123163
7Riverchase - Hutchison1561227193
8JLTC - Lockhart/Johnson1541430197
9Gardendale - Zassoda/Waldrop0601836217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Cheryl Lockhart
published 3.5
2.92
Shaunda Kidd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Valerie Jeter Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Mya Nathan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.49
Doris Gaines
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Tina Johnson-Wright
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.24
Mary Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.22
Vanessa Ellison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.08
Felicia Carter Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.08
LaKenzise Mayberry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LaKenzise Mayberry + Mary Mullins3254% games+8.8% vs expected
Felicia Carter Johnson + Doris Gaines4251% gamesnot enough data
Vanessa Ellison + Mary Mullins1441% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Jeter Campbell + Mary Mullins224 matchesnot enough data
Mya Nathan + Tina Johnson-Wright033 matchesnot enough data
Mya Nathan + Vanessa Ellison033 matchesnot enough data
LaKenzise Mayberry + Doris Gaines033 matchesnot enough data
Tina Johnson-Wright + Mary Mullins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Lockhart
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Shaunda Kidd
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
Valerie Jeter Campbell
13W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Mya Nathan
1W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
Doris Gaines
7W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Tina Johnson-Wright
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Mary Mullins
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Vanessa Ellison
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Felicia Carter Johnson
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
LaKenzise Mayberry
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.