Teams

Black-CC

2026 CORTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-07vs Dupree/Kirksey-CCWon 32
W#1 DoublesStephanie Broom / Hailey Dickson vs Melanie Gowens / Gloria Shayne7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlex Lynch vs Tracie Nobles6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSymantha Pezold / Victoria McKernan vs Lisa Dupree / Nakevia Holmes5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLeslie Beaudoin vs Jane Hudson6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Fleming / Dorothy Kirkland vs Robin Sands / JoAnn Chhokar3-6, 4-6
2026-03-03vs Byrd-CCWon 32
W#1 DoublesTara Tyler / Joylene Coker vs Mary Daniel / Tammy Briggs4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSophi Black vs Patricia Spenard6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Champion / Symantha Pezold vs Diana Newman / Wanda Dryman7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesVictoria McKernan vs Victoria Newman2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrandy Sipling / Maureen Tillman vs Tina Lamb / Audra Beaudoin6-3, 6-2
2026-02-28vs Kelley-CCCLost 23
L#1 DoublesHailey Dickson / Kelly Schramm vs Graehm Helen Oliver / Jamie Stovall2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlex Lynch vs Melanie Terry2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Fleming / Katherine Jackson vs Tina Cox / Aminta Flowers6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLeslie Beaudoin vs Libbie Stone5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesClaire Wilkes / Dorothy Kirkland vs Selwyn Kelley / Kayla Bloor7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-16vs CORTA/Jennifer MiltonLost 23
W#1 DoublesHailey Dickson / Stephanie Broom vs Jennifer Milton / Amy Nelson7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKelly Schramm vs Kyra Cottle6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDorothy Kirkland / Andrea Bingham vs Beth Bastien / Sarah Kimmel4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLeslie Beaudoin vs Ana Osborne1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJoylene Coker / Rebecca Fleming vs Katherine Snavely / Helen Snavely3-6, 4-6
2026-02-14vs Walters-GILost 23
L#1 DoublesJoylene Coker / Andrea Bingham vs Gabriela Barrs / Laura Lee2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeslie Beaudoin vs Lena Weaver6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHailey Dickson / Stephanie Broom vs Leah Poole / Kristin Walters6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRebecca Fleming vs Ali Cichos2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria McKernan / Claire Wilkes vs Jennifer Joyner / Elaine Laughbaum2-6, 4-6
2026-02-07vs Byrd-CCWon 41
W#1 DoublesJennifer Champion / Leslie Beaudoin vs Mary Daniel / Tammy Briggs6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAlex Lynch vs Victoria Newman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVictoria McKernan / Claire Wilkes vs Angela Byrd / Melissa Sievers6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKelly Schramm vs Patricia Spenard6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Jackson / Brandy Sipling vs Tina Lamb / Wanda Dryman7-6, 6-0
2026-01-24vs Dupree/Kirksey-CCWon 32
L#1 DoublesJoylene Coker / Jennifer Champion vs Melanie Gowens / Nancy Roman5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Schramm vs Nakevia Holmes6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDorothy Kirkland / Tara Tyler vs JoAnn Chhokar / Robin Sands3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAlex Lynch vs Jane Hudson6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrandy Sipling / Maureen Tillman vs Peggy Gund / Jennifer Graham6-0, 6-4
2026-01-21vs Kelley-CCCLost 14
L#1 DoublesStephanie Broom / Hailey Dickson vs Jamie Stovall / Martha Meador1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShelly Blanton vs Cassidy Pearson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoylene Coker / Tara Tyler vs Hannah Mize / Emily Moore1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSophi Black vs Libbie Stone2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Jackson / Rebecca Fleming vs Gigi Schorr / Christy Hubbard6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CORTA/Jennifer Milton80281226270
2Kelley-CCC7131924273
3Walters-GI44231739322
4Black-CC44202044346
5Dupree/Kirksey-CC08103062425

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Hailey Dickson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
Andrea Bingham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Stephanie Broom
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Claire Wilkes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Joylene Coker
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.73
Kelly Schramm
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Brandy Sipling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Dorothy Kirkland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Tara Tyler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Leslie Beaudoin
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.61
Sophi Black
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.60
Alex Lynch
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.56
Jennifer Champion
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Maureen Tillman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Shelly Blanton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.47
Rebecca Fleming
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.46
Victoria McKernan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.40
Katherine Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Symantha Pezold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Blanton + Joylene Coker6353% games+7.0% vs expected
Stephanie Broom + Hailey Dickson9558% games+2.2% vs expected
Tara Tyler + Joylene Coker5941% games+1.1% vs expected
Maureen Tillman + Brandy Sipling5648% games−7.4% vs expected
Rebecca Fleming + Katherine Jackson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Hailey Dickson
21W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Andrea Bingham
39W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Stephanie Broom
21W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Claire Wilkes
6W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Joylene Coker
30W–79L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Kelly Schramm
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brandy Sipling
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Dorothy Kirkland
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
Tara Tyler
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Leslie Beaudoin
18W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.62
Sophi Black
11W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Alex Lynch
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
Jennifer Champion
13W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Maureen Tillman
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Shelly Blanton
13W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
Rebecca Fleming
52W–67L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.47
Victoria McKernan
15W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
Katherine Jackson
20W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
Symantha Pezold
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.