Teams

Winter Haven City 6.5 - G. Tardy

2023 Polk Combo 18 & Over Spring · 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGeraldine Tardy / Briquel Joiner vs Kara Reber / Teresa Osborn5-7, 6-7
2023-06-15vs CC of Winter Haven - L. MasonLost 01
L#3 DoublesLiz Oenbrink / Geraldine Tardy vs Marley McAdams / Courtney McCrystal6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-25vs Beerman - J. BordenLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeraldine Tardy / Leslie Simmons vs Jennifer Rogers / Melissa Darch2-6, 5-7
2023-05-18vs Lakeland Country Club - L. ClarkWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeraldine Tardy / Marcia Whitney vs Lauren Lloyd / Lizette Murphy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-11vs CC of Winter Haven - L. MasonLost 02
L#2 DoublesGeraldine Tardy / Marcia Whitney vs Elizabeth Merritt / Marley McAdams6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJan Hyman / Liz Oenbrink vs Lauren Mason / Leah Carrerou3-6, 3-6
2023-05-04vs Beerman Overserved - R. CoultonLost 01
L#3 DoublesGeraldine Tardy / Marcia Whitney vs Amanda Smith / Desiree Tchipanova3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-20vs Beerman - J. BordenLost 02
L#2 DoublesAngela Johnson / Geraldine Tardy vs Anna Previte / Hayley Hurd6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJan Hyman / Gloria Murphy vs Tessie Beltran / Karen Hogg1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Tiffany Choe
published
3.22
Marcia Whitney
published 3.5
3.15
Leslie Simmons
published
3.07
Gloria Murphy
published 3.5
2.90
Geraldine Tardy
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.62
Jan Hyman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Liz Oenbrink
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geraldine Tardy + Marcia Whitney4447% games+10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Choe
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Marcia Whitney
61W–80L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Leslie Simmons
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Gloria Murphy
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Geraldine Tardy
102W–114L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Jan Hyman
66W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
2.62
Liz Oenbrink
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.