Teams

Polk/N. Giusto/40&Over3.5W

2023 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Martin / Maria Ramka vs Jennifer Rogers / Aroma Taicher5-7, 3-6
2023-05-31vs City of WH - J. EdwardsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Martin / Nathaly Arredondo vs Marcia Whitney / Geraldine Tardy3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmanda Smith / Maria Ramka vs Courtney McCrystal / Victoria Karen6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKim Martin / Cynthia Hallock vs Jan Hyman / Elizabeth Merritt6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-05-17vs Bartow Gang - D. PyleLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Martin / Cynthia Hallock vs Svetlana Darrow / Regina Espitia4-6, 4-6
2023-05-10vs Beerman - M. BullWon 10
W#3 DoublesKara Reber / Maria Ramka vs Melissa Darch / Anna Previte6-4, 6-2
2023-05-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesNathaly Arredondo / Joanne Collier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-26vs City of WH - J. EdwardsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesNathaly Arredondo vs Tiffany Choe3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Shoemaker / Maria Ramka vs Michele Moses / Marquel Harrell6-1, 6-1
2023-04-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesCynthia Hallock / Kim Martin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Nicole Giusto
published
3.53
Jennifer Spann
published
3.41
Angie Shoemaker
published 3.5
3.41
Jennifer Casey
published
3.22
Cynthia Hallock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Maria Ramka
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Nathaly Arredondo
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.04
Joanne Collier
published
3.03
Desiree Tchipanova
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Hallock + Nathaly Arredondo3351% gamesnot enough data
Maria Ramka + Nathaly Arredondo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Giusto
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Spann
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Angie Shoemaker
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jennifer Casey
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Cynthia Hallock
65W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Maria Ramka
86W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Nathaly Arredondo
78W–70L career · 9 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
Joanne Collier
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Desiree Tchipanova
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.