Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM4.0B

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-16vs BAY CLUB PL 40AM4.0BLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael O'Hara / Terry Hill vs Raymond Hool / Michael Welpott5-7, 2-6
2025-02-05vs BAY CLUB PL 40AM4.0BWon 10
W#3 DoublesKranthi Tappita / Michael O'Hara vs Paul Hendrickson / Roberto Factura6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Parag Bhatt
published
3.83
Stephen Buchholz
published
3.78
Maxwell Njelita
published
Darien Lum
published 4
3.73
Paul Morrow
published
3.72
Garvin Tom
published
3.72
Brian Kuritsubo
published 4
3.71
Siddharth Nigam
published
3.70
Jonathan Lien
published
3.63
Lloyd Hohenstein
published
3.62
Michael O'Hara
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Justin Snyder
published
3.58
Scott Judy
published
3.54
Ramin Naeini
published
3.40
Clark Walmer
published 4
3.33
Kevin Kyono
published
3.24
Alan Lam
published 3.5
John Hadley
published
Matthew Matrisian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ron Edwall
published
Sean Barnacascel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Buchholz + Garvin Tom8259% games+8.3% vs expected
Scott Judy + Maxwell Njelita2444% games−5.3% vs expected
Stephen Buchholz + Scott Judy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parag Bhatt
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Stephen Buchholz
26W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Maxwell Njelita
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Darien Lum
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Morrow
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Garvin Tom
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Brian Kuritsubo
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Siddharth Nigam
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Jonathan Lien
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Lloyd Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Michael O'Hara
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Justin Snyder
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Scott Judy
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Ramin Naeini
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Clark Walmer
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Kevin Kyono
28W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Alan Lam
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
John Hadley
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Matrisian
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ron Edwall
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Barnacascel
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.