Teams

FV:Sorry not Sorry Over 40:Danielsen/

2025 NCT Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-18vs FV:40 Plus:Moir/KeithWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Danielsen / Paul Vandal vs Kyle Johnson / Kevin Carr6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesThomas Frewen vs Erik Carlson6-4, 4-6, 6-1
2025-05-10vs FV:40 Plus:Moir/KeithWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Vandal / John Scarfo vs Chad Moir / Erik Carlson6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJasdeep Singh vs Donald Namnoum2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Braun / John Danielsen vs Kevin Carr / Eric Truntz6-2, 6-3
2025-05-03vs FV:40 Plus:Moir/KeithSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Danielsen / David Alkire vs Erik Carlson / Donald Namnoum7-5, 2-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJasdeep Singh vs Oleg Chubarev4-6, 3-6
2025-04-12vs FV:40 Plus:Moir/KeithWon 31
W#1 DoublesJasdeep Singh / Feng Chen vs Ryan Reese / Erik Carlson2-6, 6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBreton Boudreaux vs Donald Namnoum2-6, 6-4, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Vandal / Jeffrey MacEl vs Jim Keith / Mark Biamonte7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSteven Teiger / Venkata Sai Kishore Nagisetti vs Kyle Johnson / Eric Truntz6-0, 6-0
2025-03-22vs FV:40 Plus:Moir/KeithWon 31
L#1 DoublesKoustubh Karadkhedkar / Venkata Sai Kishore Nagisetti vs Donald Namnoum / Erik Carlson5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJasdeep Singh vs Ryan Reese7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGregory Jablonski / John Danielsen vs Christopher POtter / Mark Biamonte4-6, 6-4, 5-1
W#3 DoublesPaul Vandal / Steven Teiger vs Mark Roy / Bob Lobley6-0, 6-2
2025-03-15vs FV:40 Plus:Moir/KeithWon 31
W#1 DoublesJohn Danielsen / Yuming Wang vs Jim Keith / Erik Carlson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJasdeep Singh vs Donald Namnoum5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Alkire / Gregory Jablonski vs Christopher Niemann / Mark Biamonte7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey MacEl / Steven Teiger vs Mark Roy / Kevin Carr6-4, 6-1
2025-03-01vs FV:40 Plus:Moir/KeithSplit 22
W#1 DoublesFeng Chen / Jasdeep Singh vs Chad Moir / Oleg Chubarev6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesThomas Frewen vs Ryan Reese0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Vandal / David Alkire vs Mark Biamonte / Mark Roy6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Braun / Jeffrey MacEl vs Kevin Carr / Erik Carlson4-6, 7-5, 2-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:Sorry not Sorry Over 40:Danielsen/0514615158
2FV:40 Plus:Moir/Keith0561430219

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Breton Boudreaux
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Feng Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Paul Vandal
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
2.85
Yuming Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
John Scarfo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Venkata Sai Kishore Nagisetti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
David Alkire
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Gregory Jablonski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Paul Braun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Thomas Frewen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.72
John Danielsen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Steven Teiger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Casey Abbott
published 3
2.39
Koustubh Karadkhedkar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jasdeep Singh
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jeffrey MacEl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Scarfo + John Danielsen044 matchesnot enough data
David Alkire + Casey Abbott134 matchesnot enough data
Feng Chen + Jasdeep Singh303 matchesnot enough data
Feng Chen + Breton Boudreaux303 matchesnot enough data
John Danielsen + Gregory Jablonski213 matchesnot enough data
David Alkire + Jeffrey MacEl213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Breton Boudreaux
35W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Feng Chen
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Paul Vandal
26W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
John Martin-Beaulieu
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Yuming Wang
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
John Scarfo
26W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Venkata Sai Kishore Nagisetti
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
David Alkire
20W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Gregory Jablonski
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Paul Braun
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Thomas Frewen
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
John Danielsen
25W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Steven Teiger
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Casey Abbott
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Koustubh Karadkhedkar
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Jasdeep Singh
12W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey MacEl
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.