Teams

Maroon/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-20vs Hoover/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesMarilyn Priest / Nicole Gresham vs Jessica Prest / Kate Blankerts5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Beno vs Anna Miller3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesOrly Cohen / Kristi Kelly vs Tiffany Chen / Toni Kim6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSamantha Bryan vs Abigail Hale6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Morgan Holley / Christine Maroon vs Catherine Pham / Leah Riek6-1, 6-2
2026-04-06vs Stemmler/Appiah-opoku/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesChristine Maroon / Mary Morgan Holley vs Lindsey Stone / Stephanie Sabbe6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKristi Kelly vs Keira Yu4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesOrly Cohen / Hailey Pierson vs Carol Fujiyoshi / Lisa Rota3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNicole Gresham vs Stacey Appiah-opoku6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNancy Pierce / Monique Raub vs Whitney Kemp / Elizabeth Derck3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-30vs Hamrick/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristi Kelly / Christine Maroon vs Emily Eggebrecht / Margaret Emley6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSamantha Bryan vs Quinn Cantwell6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Gresham / Hailey Pierson vs Morgan Estep / Jenny Hamrick6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAmy Beno vs Michelle Nealy6-3, 6-0
2026-03-23vs Angus/NashvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesChristine Maroon / Mary Morgan Holley vs Lele Thompson / Alison Grippo6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSamantha Bryan vs Joy Harris6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHailey Pierson / Nicole Gresham vs Sarah Angus / Elizabeth Coburn6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Beno vs Kelli Haywood2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCristin Webb / Heidi Kemp vs Katye Hughes / Jill Talbert5-7, 5-7
2026-03-10vs Hoover/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Morgan Holley / Kristi Kelly vs Grace van Winkle / Leah Riek6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSamantha Bryan vs Carey Hoover6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicole Gresham / Marilyn Priest vs Anna Miller / Brittany Rae1-1
W#3 DoublesOrly Cohen / Nancy Pierce vs Abigail Hale / Jessica Prest6-3, 6-0
2026-03-09vs Armor/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Maroon / Mary Morgan Holley vs Maggie Piazza / Ryann Bauguess6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSamantha Bryan vs Noell Rembert4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOrly Cohen / Nicole Gresham vs Jordan Rausch / Mary Elizabeth Armor3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Priest / Cristin Webb vs Faith Jennings / Shaun Sternklar6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Samantha Bryan
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.83
Mary Morgan Holley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Kristi Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.79
Marilyn Priest
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Christine Maroon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Nicole Gresham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.64
Hailey Pierson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Cristin Webb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Amy Beno
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.63
Nancy Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Heidi Kemp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Orly Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Monique Raub
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Morgan Holley + Hailey Pierson6359% games+23.5% vs expected
Christine Maroon + Orly Cohen5750% games+10.4% vs expected
Cristin Webb + Heidi Kemp3745% games−5.6% vs expected
Christine Maroon + Mary Morgan Holley404 matchesnot enough data
Orly Cohen + Mary Morgan Holley314 matchesnot enough data
Orly Cohen + Nancy Pierce303 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Gresham + Hailey Pierson123 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Gresham + Monique Raub303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Bryan
12W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Mary Morgan Holley
19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.83
Kristi Kelly
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Marilyn Priest
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Christine Maroon
14W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Nicole Gresham
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Hailey Pierson
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Cristin Webb
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Amy Beno
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Nancy Pierce
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Heidi Kemp
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Orly Cohen
16W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Monique Raub
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.