Teams

Corpus-Dolls with Balls

2026 40 & Over Little State · Ladies 3.0 Flight

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · Ladies 3.0 Flight
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1San Angelo - Slice Girls000000
2SA Slammers000000
3Harlingen-Overserved000000
4NOHO - Serves You Right000000
5Corpus-Racquettes000000
6Corpus-Dolls with Balls000000
7San Antonio - Fireballs000000
8Fair Oaks Ranch-Love Me Not000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Daralyn Lopez
published 3
2.92
Amanda Pruett
published 3
2.91
Tisha Belcher
published
2.88
2.80
Grais Banks
published 3
2.70
Mara Ellis
published
2.68
Angie Britton
published 3
2.63
Amy Roberts
published 3
2.62
ISLA LARA
published 3
2.55
Lina Diaz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Montgomery + Mara Ellis4157% games+12.0% vs expected
Beverly Montgomery + Tisha Belcher6358% games+8.1% vs expected
Tisha Belcher + Amanda Pruett4159% games+6.8% vs expected
Beverly Montgomery + Amy Roberts3255% gamesnot enough data
Amy Roberts + Lina Diaz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daralyn Lopez
49W–29L career · no lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
3
Amanda Pruett
22W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Tisha Belcher
34W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Beverly Montgomery
32W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Grais Banks
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Mara Ellis
10W–13L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Angie Britton
18W–36L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Amy Roberts
16W–15L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
ISLA LARA
12W–31L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.62
Lina Diaz
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.