Teams

Quail Valley/George

2025 IRMSL Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women

22 players · average NTRP 3.81 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-02vs Winner/Boulevard/McLaurinLost 02
L#2 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Julia Durham vs Anita Venner / Sue Davis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJean Glicini / Eliot Foote vs Terri Blando / Cheryl von Zielinski6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2025-11-18vs Winner/Boulevard/McLaurinLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Jennifer Dutile vs Leslie London / Michele Packard2-6, 5-7
2025-11-04vs Winner/Boulevard/McLaurinLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynn Southerly / Julia Durham vs Rachael McLaurin / Michele Packard1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Ritter / Kristen Yoshitani vs Wendy Orthober / Catherine Spahr0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesArianne George / Laurie Connelly vs Anita Venner / Sue Davis6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-28vs Winner/Boulevard/McLaurinWon 21
L#1 DoublesArianne George / Jennifer Dutile vs Wendy Orthober / Michele Packard5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Southerly / Jennifer MacDonald vs Sherri Glaab / Melissa Dean6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Ritter / Kristen Yoshitani vs Terri Blando / Risa StClair6-2, 6-3
2025-10-21vs Winner/Boulevard/McLaurinWon 10
W#3 DoublesJean Glicini / Eliot Foote vs Leslie London / Melissa Dean7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-14vs Winner/Boulevard/McLaurinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJean Glicini / Elke Higgins vs Rachael McLaurin / Michele Packard6-4, 6-1
2025-10-07vs Winner/Boulevard/McLaurinWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Elke Higgins vs Leslie London / Cynthia Croom6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Arianne George
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Allison Ritter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Lynn Southerly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Mary Lunn
published
3.68
Kathy Fennell
published
3.62
Elke Higgins
published 4
3.62
Heather MacIntyre
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Julia Durham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jennifer MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Debbie Barnes
published 4
3.43
Eliot Foote
published 3.5
3.37
Kelly Johnson
published
3.35
Sara Lloyd
published
3.33
Jean Glicini
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Cassy West
published 3.5
3.25
Laurie Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Christine Kahler
published 3.5
3.18
Kristen Yoshitani
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Patty Grady
published
3.10
Pia Gold
published
Rachel Leyda
published
Tiffani Buckley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Durham + Jennifer MacDonald5076% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Southerly + Allison Ritter134 matchesnot enough data
Heather MacIntyre + Arianne George033 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Southerly + Jennifer MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arianne George
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Allison Ritter
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Lynn Southerly
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Mary Lunn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Kathy Fennell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Elke Higgins
3W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Heather MacIntyre
39W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.62
Julia Durham
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jennifer MacDonald
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
4
Debbie Barnes
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Eliot Foote
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Kelly Johnson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.37
Sara Lloyd
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Jean Glicini
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Cassy West
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Connelly
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Christine Kahler
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Kristen Yoshitani
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Patty Grady
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Pia Gold
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Rachel Leyda
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffani Buckley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.