Teams

USTA Campus-Oliver

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Combo 18 & Over-SUMMER Day · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-15vs Orange/NaumenkoLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Sanders / Abigail Roofner vs Jenna Johns / Jennifer Gihon5-7, 1-6
2025-08-08vs Orange/NaumenkoLost 01
L#3 DoublesLeslie Sanders / Eileen Gibson vs Valentina Naumenko / Maria Ampong5-7, 3-6
2025-07-25vs Orange/NaumenkoLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Godorov / Maggie Ueland vs Jenna Johns / Jennifer Gihon0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEileen Gibson / Shelley Sprague vs Vickie Jorda / Lindsey Holcomb2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShauna Bartel / Karen Oliver vs Alexa McCulley / Maria Ampong6-7, 2-6
2025-07-18vs Orange/NaumenkoLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie Sanders / Maggie Ueland vs Elly Phoebus / Justine Tigno-Aranjuez7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Leslie Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Kristie Hickok
published
2.45
Abigail Roofner
published 3
2.35
Shauna Bartel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Karen Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Jeannie Triola
published
Brittnie Faine
published 2.5
Eileen Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maggie Ueland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shelley Sprague
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Godorov
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Oliver + Shauna Bartel0715% games−14.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Sanders
66W–115L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Kristie Hickok
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Abigail Roofner
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.45
Shauna Bartel
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35
Karen Oliver
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34
Jeannie Triola
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.29
2.5
Brittnie Faine
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eileen Gibson
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maggie Ueland
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Sprague
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Godorov
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.