Teams

Bryan - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-06vs Haigler - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesIngrid Corbett / Sally Bergosh vs Carol Essex / Sharon Powell6-0, 6-3
2025-03-25vs Haigler - RS ClayWon 20
W#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Thuy Nguyen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSally Bergosh / Ingrid Corbett vs Sharon Powell / Klara Szalai6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Escambia/Wallace/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesIngrid Corbett / Tanya Hughes vs Rene Abel / Sue Nast3-6, 4-6
2025-03-17vs Escambia/Wallace/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Bryan / Thuy Nguyen vs Rene Abel / Kris Pritchard0-6, 3-6
2025-02-08vs Haigler - RS ClayLost 12
L#1 DoublesThuy Nguyen / Patricia Leahy vs Carol Essex / Sharon Powell7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Greskovich / Jill Kunkel vs Cindy Jenista / Dana Persons6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBonnie Bucco / Barbara French vs Klara Szalai / Nena Haigler2-6, 3-6
2025-02-01vs Escambia/Wallace/55&Over7.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesIngrid Corbett / Tanya Hughes vs Heather Doerr / Maria Hicks3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Thuy Nguyen vs Amelia Gandy / Kris Pritchard6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jill Kunkel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Van Hughes
published 3.5
3.26
Bonnie Bucco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Mary Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Ingrid Corbett
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Sally Bergosh
published
2.98
Theresa Smith
published
2.65
Barbara French
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lisa Greskovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Leahy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tanya Hughes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Van Hughes + Mary Bryan3844% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Kunkel
41W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Van Hughes
83W–83L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Bonnie Bucco
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Ingrid Corbett
67W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Sally Bergosh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Theresa Smith
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Barbara French
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Lisa Greskovich
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Leahy
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tanya Hughes
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.