Teams

VCC GREEN

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-07vs PRKR ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Savela / Emily Yeingst vs Elizabeth Devecchi / Vicky M Martin7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErika Rippee / Amy Bergan vs Misty Candela / Susan Goldman6-1, 6-3
2024-07-31vs LTFC TEALLost 02
L#1 SinglesErika Rippee vs Charity Aslin1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStacy Johnson / Kathy Etheridge vs Sheila Baker / Katie Johnson1-6, 6-7
2024-07-24vs PCC PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Yeingst / Jill Savela vs Adrienne Cramer / Jean Shaver6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErika Rippee / Kim Brogus vs Roxanne Blair / Whitney Vaccari6-3, 6-4
2024-07-17vs RRTC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Savela / Erika Rippee vs Janice Ramirez / Liz Shepard6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStacy Johnson / Emily Yeingst vs Beth Hoffman / Amy Anema2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-10vs PRC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Bergan / Erika Rippee vs Amber Harris / Sarah Hughes3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKim Brogus / Kathy Etheridge vs Sharon Kisch / Kari Graham4-6, 6-7
2024-07-03vs CPV TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesErika Rippee / Jill Savela vs Andrea Smart / Betsy Heggie6-0, 7-5
2024-06-26vs SS-LT ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Yeingst / Kathy Etheridge vs Stevie Vencil / Katherine Barnes1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Johnson / Erika Rippee vs Winddee Stallings / Karina Block7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Emily Yeingst
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Amy Bergan
published 3
2.70
Erika Rippee
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.60
Stacy Johnson
published
2.55
Kathy Etheridge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jill Savela
published
Kim Brogus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Yeingst + Erika Rippee123 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Johnson + Kathy Etheridge213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Yeingst
96W–91L career · 4 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Amy Bergan
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Erika Rippee
78W–64L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.70
Stacy Johnson
16W–21L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
2.60
3
Kathy Etheridge
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.55
Jill Savela
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Brogus
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.