Teams

5 MRTC Thornton

2022 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.78 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-11vs 6 Dominion BalesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Dugger / Karl Jones vs Joe Basil / Jeff Duffy6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-08-05vs 4 acac Stephens Advance 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Gates / Jimmy Ghaphery vs Jeff Bosch / Jeff Richman4-6, 4-6
2022-08-02vs 7 Lakeside HowellWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Gates / Jimmy Ghaphery vs Ravi Ravichandran / Bo Bowden6-4, 6-1
2022-07-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Bill James vs John Barnes / David Scheetz7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-05vs 6 Dominion BalesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlexander Howlett / Karl Jones vs Joseph Cappellino / Paul DeLuca2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-16vs 4 acac Stephens Advance 8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Anderson / Karl Jones vs Scott Kim / Charles Sipe3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Bill James vs Don Caffery / Jeff Richman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Jimmy Ghaphery
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.85
Fernando Andrews
published 4
3.69
Bob Denue
published 4
3.68
James Dugger
published 4
3.62
Earl Meekins
published 4
3.37
Karl Jones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Edward Thornton
published 3.5
3.09
James Skinner
published 3.5
2.86
Bill James
published 3
Kevin Cousins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Dugger + Bill James5451% games+0.8% vs expected
Jimmy Ghaphery + Karl Jones314 matchesnot enough data
James Dugger + Fernando Andrews213 matchesnot enough data
James Dugger + Bob Denue123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jimmy Ghaphery
61W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Fernando Andrews
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Bob Denue
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
James Dugger
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Earl Meekins
11W–18L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Karl Jones
144W–148L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Edward Thornton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
James Skinner
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Bill James
20W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
Kevin Cousins
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.