Teams

3-SClark-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-11vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCAWon 10
W#3 DoublesBert Clancey / Carl Laird vs Steven Rochkind / Mark McCullough6-1, 6-3
2022-05-04vs 4-TBuckley-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Lacy / John Lockhead vs Steve Dischinger / Wendell Gilland1-6, 3-6
2022-04-27vs 1-DStefan-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesBert Clancey / John Lockhead vs Scott Hartman / David Stefan3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-20vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCAWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Lockhead / R Chapman vs Henry Pereira / Vincent Illiano4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-13vs 4-TBuckley-CHTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Lockhead / Carl Laird vs Mark Higuchi / Robert Kern6-1, 6-3
2022-04-06vs 1-DStefan-HSLost 01
L#2 DoublesGene Brady / Carl Laird vs Dave Thomas / David Stefan2-6, 0-6
2022-03-30vs 2-RGildehaus-YMCALost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Lacy / John Lockhead vs Ed Holub / David Holub3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Glen Hacker
published 3.5
3.08
Bert Clancey
published 3.5
2.96
John Lockhead
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.84
Carl Laird
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Brian Bornstein
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Glen Hacker
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Bert Clancey
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
John Lockhead
51W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Carl Laird
42W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Brian Bornstein
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.