Teams

ANWP

2025 Adult 55 and Over League · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.61 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-18vs OC 55PLUSWon 30
W#1 DoublesEriko Francisco / Sumi Matsumiya vs Cynthia Rankin / Tracy Hirota6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKeiko Jaffuel / Hiroko Fukui vs Jane Cleland / Sarah Kistler6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKazumi Fukuda / Yoko Naka vs Chie Friday / Vivian Martirosian6-3, 6-0
2025-05-04vs KLTC 55+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTomoko L Hirano / Sumi Matsumiya vs Lori Loo / Gerri Takayama4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaire Pattinson / Yasuko Sugimoto vs Anna Womack / Karen Yamaguchi2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKazumi Fukuda / Yoko Naka vs Violeta Pontillas / Stephanie Tsuzaki2-6, 4-6
2025-04-27vs Happy Hour! Double Shots!Won 21
W#1 DoublesKazumi Fukuda / Yoko Naka vs Barbara Lowe / Phoebe Nikolakakis1-0, 0-0
L#2 DoublesTomoko L Hirano / Keiko Jaffuel vs Jenny Wendel / Francine Crail4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSumi Matsumiya / Eriko Francisco vs M Wendy Wailehua / Cyd Nishino7-6, 6-1
2025-04-13vs Aloha AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMakiko Brandon / Yoko Naka vs Kathryn Kirley / Tessa Travers6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHiroko Fukui / Sumi Matsumiya vs Kathie Desautels / Paulette Rowe6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaire Pattinson / Rumiko Wong vs Veronica Manz / Laurel Shim6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-06vs QuicksilverWon 30
W#1 DoublesHiroko Fukui / Keiko Jaffuel vs Madeline Chun / Debbie Au6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEriko Francisco / Sumi Matsumiya vs Marie Wilson / Ada Ozaki4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYasuko Sugimoto / Claire Pattinson vs Diane Sugahara / Janis Shinyama6-0, 6-0
2025-03-30vs Fireball 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesKazumi Fukuda / Yoko Naka vs Candace Pahukula / Donna Mosier6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMakiko Brandon / Yasuko Sugimoto vs Lori Fujimori / Yoko Casados7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTomoko L Hirano / Keiko Jaffuel vs Allynne Tom / Ida Thiede6-3, 6-4
2025-03-23vs What The DeuceWon 30
W#1 DoublesTomoko L Hirano / Hiroko Fukui vs Joanie Shibuya / Lisa Lai6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYasuko Sugimoto / Claire Pattinson vs Karen Howes / Wendy Barnfield6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMakiko Brandon / Yoko Naka vs Melissa Botha / Suzanne Bernstein2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-16vs Love Me NotWon 30
W#1 DoublesTomoko L Hirano / Sumi Matsumiya vs Maria Kulka / Lianne Nishimiya6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKazumi Fukuda / Yasuko Sugimoto vs Shari Kochiyama / Teri Imanaka6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRumiko Wong / Claire Pattinson vs Janice Goo / Diane MacK6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-09vs Mudslides & MimosasWon 21
W#1 DoublesKeiko Jaffuel / Yasuko Sugimoto vs Vera Yamanaka / Jacqueline Ornellas2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEriko Francisco / Tomoko L Hirano vs Nalani Sue / Cora Toledo6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHiroko Fukui / Yoko Naka vs Trina Onuma / Olivia Rezentes2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kazumi Fukuda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Claire Pattinson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
Makiko Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.56
Tomoko L Hirano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Hiroko Fukui
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Sumi Matsumiya
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Eriko Francisco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Keiko Jaffuel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Yoko Naka
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.90
Rumiko Wong
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eriko Francisco + Sumi Matsumiya5451% games+1.4% vs expected
Hiroko Fukui + Keiko Jaffuel4350% games−4.0% vs expected
Eriko Francisco + Yoko Naka2338% games−7.1% vs expected
Kazumi Fukuda + Yoko Naka4169% gamesnot enough data
Hiroko Fukui + Eriko Francisco314 matchesnot enough data
Makiko Brandon + Yoko Naka314 matchesnot enough data
Claire Pattinson + Yoko Naka404 matchesnot enough data
Sumi Matsumiya + Tomoko L Hirano404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kazumi Fukuda
47W–26L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Claire Pattinson
25W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Makiko Brandon
60W–72L career · 9 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Tomoko L Hirano
85W–38L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Hiroko Fukui
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Sumi Matsumiya
57W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Eriko Francisco
48W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Keiko Jaffuel
55W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Yoko Naka
42W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Rumiko Wong
65W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.