Teams

McMullen Ebony & Ivory

2025 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-15vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Won 31
W#1 DoublesTricia Lolkus / Joan Whitten vs Monika Hazners / Jennifer Hobbs6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLaMonica Lovett vs Biatta Malkiewicz6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKim Williams / Esthela Gonzalez vs Cathrine Chin / Eileen Beck7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesZilya Ruga / Monica Brown vs Meg DeSomery / Jennifer Gibson2-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs Pinellas/Rodrigues/18&Over3.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Williams / Esthela Gonzalez vs Carrie Kilgroe / Nelci Rodrigues6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTricia Lolkus / Joan Whitten vs Trisha Shirkey / Jennifer Casey6-4, 6-4
2025-02-22vs Ardea BraudisLost 13
L#1 DoublesTricia Lolkus / Joan Whitten vs Karen Braudis / Kari Matheny5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKim Williams / Zilya Ruga vs Laura Hungiville / Deborah Avanzato3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLaMonica Lovett vs Gail Stallwood6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMoise Carrington / Kayla Churchill vs Teresa Orr / Lou Reavis3-6, 4-6
2025-02-15vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesKim Williams / Esthela Gonzalez vs Brooke Rosenberg / Kristi Downs7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTricia Lolkus / Joan Whitten vs Breezy Paulus / Kenzier McIntyre6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMonica Brown / Kayla Churchill vs Eileen Beck / Danielle Coke5-7, 1-2
2025-02-08vs Seminole Lake PriceLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Williams / Esthela Gonzalez vs Danielle Haggar / Kathleen Betancourt4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTricia Lolkus / Joan Whitten vs Christine Price / Christine Campbell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKayla Churchill / Monica Brown vs Sally Blush / Carol Vitelli5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-05vs Seminole Lake PriceLost 05
L#1 DoublesKim Williams / Joan Whitten vs Christine Campbell / Jill MacNeil6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTricia Lolkus vs Monica Barkett2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaMonica Lovett / Brianna Arnold vs Christina Carnahan / Lina Chaves3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKayla Churchill vs Jennifer Botelho0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMoise Carrington / Zilya Ruga vs Sally Blush / Dolores Salazar7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-01-18vs Pinellas/Rodrigues/18&Over3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Whitten / LaMonica Lovett vs Carrie Kilgroe / Pippin Gilbert6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEsthela Gonzalez / Moise Carrington vs Trisha Shirkey / Maribel Gross6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTricia Lolkus vs Heather Perpetua6-3, 6-0
2025-01-04vs Ardea BraudisLost 04
L#1 DoublesJoan Whitten / Moise Carrington vs Karen Braudis / Helene Newsome3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLaMonica Lovett vs Erin Chenderlin2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTricia Lolkus vs Judy Carlin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNivea Urdaneta / Monica Brown vs Liwen Tao / Martha Cornatzer3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Tricia Lolkus
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.49
Joan Whitten
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.35
LaMonica Lovett
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Esthela Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Moise Carrington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Brianna Arnold
published 3.5
3.19
Kayla Churchill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Zilya Ruga
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Nivea Urdaneta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Whitten + Tricia Lolkus22657% games+4.3% vs expected
Kayla Churchill + Moise Carrington6650% gamesnot enough data
Esthela Gonzalez + Zilya Ruga6451% gamesnot enough data
LaMonica Lovett + Joan Whitten5455% gamesnot enough data
Joan Whitten + Moise Carrington4444% gamesnot enough data
Esthela Gonzalez + Moise Carrington2344% gamesnot enough data
Esthela Gonzalez + Tricia Lolkus4155% gamesnot enough data
Esthela Gonzalez + Joan Whitten033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tricia Lolkus
97W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Joan Whitten
182W–137L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
LaMonica Lovett
51W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Esthela Gonzalez
127W–146L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Moise Carrington
67W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Brianna Arnold
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Kayla Churchill
20W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Zilya Ruga
42W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Nivea Urdaneta
26W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.