Teams

12 MTC Fuster 4.0

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-22vs 7 Ridgetop Riggs 4.0Lost 14
W#1 DoublesRoss Overstreet / John Kim vs David Brown / William Pilc6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNiell Jacobsen vs Owen Alberti6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Quirk / Roger Wisor vs Doug Blouch / Bob Riggs3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChristopher Geoghegan vs Alex Abbott4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Johnson / Michael Steele vs Laurent Beausergent / Zach Daniel6-7, 4-6
2025-05-01vs 13 CCV ACES - Campbell 4.0Lost 14
L#1 DoublesSam Kang / Ross Overstreet vs Rolf Welch / Russell Moore2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristopher Geoghegan vs Johan Lood3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Marino / Jeffrey Johnson vs Russell Fergusson / Ryan Mitchell3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesBenjamin Andrews vs Brad Shiveley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoger Wisor / Christopher Quirk vs David Campbell / Greg Gordon3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesSam Kang / John Kim vs Bart Nasta / Ryan Politowicz3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChristopher Quirk vs YOUNG CHOE6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Johnson / Benjamin Andrews vs Paul Kelly / Braxton Fagan4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesChristopher Geoghegan vs William Wise6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRoger Wisor / Michael Steele vs Bryan Fisher / Mac Stuckey3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christopher Quirk
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.58
Ross Overstreet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Christopher Geoghegan
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.39
Roger Wisor
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.34
Yalier Fuster
published
3.26
Benjamin Andrews
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Jeffrey Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.13
Tracy Marks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joseph Marino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Niell Jacobsen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ryan Marks
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sam Kang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Quirk
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Overstreet
11W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Christopher Geoghegan
23W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Roger Wisor
38W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Yalier Fuster
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Benjamin Andrews
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Jeffrey Johnson
23W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Joseph Marino
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Niell Jacobsen
15W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Marks
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Kang
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.