Teams

HU - Brewster

Combo Doubles 65 & Over Invitational · 6.5 Women - 6 Team Draw (CLOSED)

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - 6 Team Draw (CLOSED) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Brenda Formby
published 3.5
3.19
Judy Wiles
published
3.11
Carolyn Holt
published 3.5
3.05
Kim McCandless
published
2.97
Marilyn Porter
published
2.90
Linda Brewster
published
2.89
2.80
Vivian Pannell
published
2.63
Rebecca Rieniets
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vivian Pannell + Kim McCandless2445% games+7.5% vs expected
Judy Wiles + Linda Brewster61542% games−6.2% vs expected
Cathy Vanvalkenburgh + Brenda Formby044 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Rieniets + Marilyn Porter314 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Formby + Linda Brewster303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brenda Formby
32W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Judy Wiles
61W–75L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carolyn Holt
15W–46L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kim McCandless
11W–21L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Marilyn Porter
17W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
Linda Brewster
38W–68L career · no lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Cathy Vanvalkenburgh
34W–39L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Vivian Pannell
8W–38L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Rebecca Rieniets
10W–15L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.