Teams

RCCB - Aboud

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-05-18vs Brevard/HingleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLael Woods / Chonda Rodrigo-butler vs Liliana Gutierrez / Dawn Green1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSpencer Mixon vs Lindsay Nichols7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErin Schlitts / Brenda Tarquinio vs Christy Galzerano / Tricia Patterson6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMaryanne Donigan / Linda Mesnard vs Denise Cottrell / Katherine Hingle6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Maryanne Donigan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Erin Schlitts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Rachel Gould
published
2.75
Brenda Tarquinio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Charmin Husty
published 3
2.67
Eileen Mcelwee
published
2.67
Spencer Mixon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Lael Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Chonda Rodrigo-butler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Linda Mesnard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Stephen Aboud
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Gould + Erin Schlitts134 matchesnot enough data
Maryanne Donigan + Chonda Rodrigo-butler224 matchesnot enough data
Lael Woods + Brenda Tarquinio213 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Mcelwee + Maryanne Donigan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maryanne Donigan
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Erin Schlitts
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Rachel Gould
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Brenda Tarquinio
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Charmin Husty
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Eileen Mcelwee
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Spencer Mixon
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Chonda Rodrigo-butler
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Linda Mesnard
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Stephen Aboud
23W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.