Teams

NEM Greater Midland POWERS

NEM Mixed 40 & Over · NEM 40&O Mixed 7.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.25 / N.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-04vs NEM Greater Midland BUNKERLost 03
L#1 DoublesCricket Krengel / Joshua Katzinger vs Gregorio Lok / Andrea Meyers6-2, 1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Humm / Dean Witherspoon vs Vicki Bunker / Charles Cilibraise2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSteve Powers / Jennifer McCullough vs Christopher Anderson / Jennifer Stockman3-6, 6-7
2026-07-18vs NEM Greater Midland BUNKERLost 12
L#2 DoublesDean Witherspoon / Jennifer McCullough vs Gregorio Lok / Nicole Lambert4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarc Beaudin / Heather Humm vs Vicki Bunker / Christopher Anderson2-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesSteve Powers / Shawn Turoski vs Charles Cilibraise / Andrea Meyers6-4, 6-3
2026-07-14vs NEM Greater Midland BUNKERLost 13
L#1 DoublesShaun Ahn / Shawn Turoski vs Darrick Gibbs / Jennifer Stockman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDean Witherspoon / Heather Humm vs Gregorio Lok / Nicole Lambert1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoshua Katzinger / Cricket Krengel vs Charles Cilibraise / Jamie Spivey6-3, 7-6
L#4 DoublesSteve Powers / Jennifer McCullough vs Gregory Bunker / Vicki Bunker4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEM 40&O Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Heather Humm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cricket Krengel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jennifer McCullough
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Shawn Turoski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Humm
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Cricket Krengel
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer McCullough
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shawn Turoski
14W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.