Teams

Central Park (Liz Barwig)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 4.0 Women (Kimberly De Fino)

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Kimberly De Fino) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Nancy Tate
published
3.90
Ana Laidman
published 4
3.89
Karen Bart
published
3.74
Joanna Stephenson
published
3.63
Liz Barwig
published
3.59
Jane Milton
published
3.47
Deborah Doss
published 3.5
3.39
Kim Plaziak
published
3.24
Harriet Connolly
published 3.5
Kimberly McKenzie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Barwig + Jane Milton7651% games−3.7% vs expected
Harriet Connolly + Jane Milton2344% gamesnot enough data
Jane Milton + Kimberly McKenzie3253% gamesnot enough data
Liz Barwig + Ana Laidman044 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Tate + Karen Bart224 matchesnot enough data
Harriet Connolly + Kimberly McKenzie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Tate
84W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Ana Laidman
40W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Karen Bart
61W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
Joanna Stephenson
47W–32L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Liz Barwig
37W–61L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Jane Milton
29W–34L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Deborah Doss
34W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
Kim Plaziak
6W–16L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Harriet Connolly
40W–69L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Kimberly McKenzie
14W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.