Teams

ACAC-Bader

2021 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Kimball / Richard Sherman vs Laura Miller / Memo Maquivar4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-03-07vs CSW-GeorgeWon 20
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Jamala Arland vs JINESH KUMAR CHINNATHAMBI / Toni O'Reilly6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRichard Sherman / Sonya Carman vs Richard Bland / Laura West Hatcher6-2, 6-3
2021-02-28vs BURK-ButterworthSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTommy Bader / Alicia Watkins vs Jonathan Allen / Erin Decker1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSonya Carman / Richard Sherman vs Karen Conway / Mike Davis6-0, 7-6
2021-02-21vs MAC-SnowLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshlyn DesMarteau / Tommy Bader vs Melissa O'Toole / Greg Deeb5-7, 2-5
2021-01-23vs ACAC-BerganWon 10
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Jamala Arland vs Neil Perron / Katherine Guerette6-4, 6-2
2021-01-17vs RAIN-EarleLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshlyn DesMarteau / Logan Gruhl vs Douglas Erickson / Crystal May1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-01-09vs SAL-MaliffSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLogan Gruhl / Ashlyn DesMarteau vs Lauren Cecil / Simon Sjogren6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTommy Bader / Alicia Watkins vs Nina Sjogren / Scott Broaddus5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Logan Gruhl
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.94
Michelle Holmes
published
3.85
Tommy Bader
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.83
Richard Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Sonya Carman
published
3.43
Keith Garrison
published
3.38
Alicia Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Ashlyn DesMarteau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Holmes + Tommy Bader213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Logan Gruhl
189W–40L career · 15 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
4.38
Michelle Holmes
49W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Tommy Bader
115W–144L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Richard Sherman
173W–54L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
Sonya Carman
21W–16L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Keith Garrison
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Alicia Watkins
218W–110L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Ashlyn DesMarteau
152W–79L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.