Teams

LWR Boylston

2022 Sarasota Trilevel Summer Weekend · 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.21 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-09-11vs Longwood WilsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Cogen / Megan McAloon vs Kara Beene / Tanya Kelly4-6, 2-6
2022-08-18vs Payne Park RoseWon 10
W#2 DoublesMegan McAloon / Kanjana Thomas vs Melissa Caldwell / Lisa Temple7-6, 7-5
2022-06-25vs JacarandaWon 10
W#2 DoublesMegan McAloon / Kanjana Thomas vs Hao Li Ee / Constance Duncan6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Christie Boylston
published 4.5
4.29
Allyson Hoffman
published 4.5
3.99
Megan McAloon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
3.79
Elizabeth Green
published 4.5
3.79
Lauren Larkin
published
Christie Uihlein
published 4
3.71
Sheila Perry
published
3.71
Karen Nicholson
published
3.69
Karen Spiegel
published
3.63
Victoria Reid
published
3.61
Barbara Cogen
published 4
3.50
Rebecca Gibson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Green + Allyson Hoffman2354% games+3.2% vs expected
Lauren Feingold Navas + Megan McAloon5066% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Larkin + Megan McAloon404 matchesnot enough data
Karen Spiegel + Lauren Feingold Navas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christie Boylston
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Allyson Hoffman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4
Megan McAloon
137W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Lauren Feingold Navas
77W–40L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4.5
Elizabeth Green
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.79
Lauren Larkin
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Christie Uihlein
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheila Perry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Karen Spiegel
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Victoria Reid
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Barbara Cogen
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Rebecca Gibson
25W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.