Teams

MLCPetrasko/PAC 18’s 6.0 Mxd

2022 18 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 6.0 Wed pm 18s

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-03vs MLSMalmstrom/CSDWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrett Bender / Lauren Herrmann vs Shannon Malmstrom / Justin Wilkes6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoseph Spain / Alicia Siebach vs Mark Mizicko / Wendy Mizicko6-2, 6-2
2022-07-27vs MLBZajac/PAC Mixed 6.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrett Bender / Lauren Herrmann vs Don Pippin / Karen Pippin6-1, 7-5
2022-07-27vs MLSMalmstrom/CSDLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Stephen / Jean Resener vs Ben Ward / Amy Ward4-6, 3-6
2022-06-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesRanjith Rajadurai / Lauren Herrmann vs Walter Rodriguez / Marcia Hostetler6-2, 6-3
2022-06-15vs MLSMalmstrom/CSDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlicia Siebach / Joseph Spain vs Shannon Malmstrom / William Burns7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJean Resener / Brett Bender vs Crystal Lambeth / Michael Palmer6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Herrmann / Julius Fernandez vs Wendy Mizicko / Mark Mizicko6-4, 6-0
2022-06-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesRussell Swift / Lauren Herrmann vs Walter Rodriguez / Elizabeth Carrasquillo4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 6.0 Wed pm 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Julius Fernandez
published
3.45
Brett Bender
published 3.5
3.32
Thomas Stephen
published
3.26
Ranjith Rajadurai
published
3.15
Lauren Herrmann
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Joseph Spain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.01
Russell Swift
published
2.87
Eugene Olsen
published 3.5
2.76
Jean Resener
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Subashini Thomas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Stephen + Subashini Thomas1443% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Herrmann + Joseph Spain224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julius Fernandez
16W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Brett Bender
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
Thomas Stephen
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Ranjith Rajadurai
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Lauren Herrmann
155W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Joseph Spain
62W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
Russell Swift
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.01
3.5
Eugene Olsen
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.87
3
Jean Resener
62W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Subashini Thomas
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.