Teams

Nixon

2026 Lubbock Adult Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Senior Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs BoggsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTorri Hatch / Jerry Jerabek vs Cody Boggs / James Cutrera2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Robbins / Holly Carter vs Stanley Brewer / Timmie DAgostino7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / Robin Nixon vs Camille Cruz / Thad Reid2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-19vs BoggsLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobin Nixon / Randy Robbins vs Stanley Brewer / Timmie DAgostino3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTorri Hatch / Brian Carter vs Camille Cruz / Thad Reid3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Carter / Jerry Jerabek vs Simon Williams / Cody Boggs6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-12vs BoggsLost 12
W#1 DoublesKeith Mann / Amy Boren vs Stanley Brewer / Timmie DAgostino6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobin Nixon / Randy Robbins vs Kelly Welch / Simon Williams4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Carter / Laura Kopytkiewicz vs Cody Boggs / James Cutrera2-6, 4-6
2026-08-05vs BoggsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Boren / Keith Mann vs Timmie DAgostino / Stanley Brewer2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / Holly Carter vs Camille Cruz / Thad Reid7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Carter / Laura Kopytkiewicz vs Cody Boggs / James Cutrera4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.0 Senior Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Nixon0112431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Amy Boren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Randy Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
John Chad Carter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Laura Kopytkiewicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brian Carter
published 3.5
3.24
Jerry Jerabek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Keith Mann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Robin Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Torri Hatch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Timothy Byars
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Kopytkiewicz + Timothy Byars1436% gamesnot enough data
Amy Boren + Keith Mann134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Boren
15W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Randy Robbins
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
John Chad Carter
36W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Laura Kopytkiewicz
23W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Brian Carter
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jerry Jerabek
29W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Keith Mann
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Robin Nixon
16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Torri Hatch
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
Timothy Byars
2W–25L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.