Teams

Tough Love

2023 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKDAY WOMEN · 4.0 Women Monday

16 players · average NTRP 3.93 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Lacey Shannon
published
3.88
Amy Swaney
published 4
3.85
Callie Musselman
published 4
3.82
Monica Rowland
published
3.70
Mary Pat Whiteside
published
3.67
Amy Figliola
published 4
3.64
Berit Gissell
published 4
3.60
Brooke Sheedy
published 4
3.53
Brianna Eilers
published 4
3.51
Katie Vincent
published
3.48
Sonia Daniels
published
3.29
Laura Guglielmo
published
Angel Schneider
published 3.5
3.23
Susie Keylon
published
Melissa Rubiola
published
Tammy Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Berit Gissell + Brooke Sheedy2345% games−4.7% vs expected
Amy Figliola + Brooke Sheedy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lacey Shannon
16W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
4.26
4
Amy Swaney
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Callie Musselman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
Monica Rowland
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
Mary Pat Whiteside
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Amy Figliola
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Berit Gissell
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Brooke Sheedy
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Brianna Eilers
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.53
Katie Vincent
32W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
Sonia Daniels
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Laura Guglielmo
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Angel Schneider
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susie Keylon
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Melissa Rubiola
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Foster
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.