Teams

1. May

2023 Virginia Refund Holding Area · Refund Holding Area

21 players · average NTRP 3.56 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund Holding Area have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andy Tucker
published 4
3.74
Kay Bransford
published 4
3.68
Jennifer DeCamp
published
3.60
3.38
Paul Davis
published
3.34
Timothy DeCamp
published
3.30
Kathleen Leary
published 3.5
3.19
Kim Hovda
published 3
3.17
Elizabeth Marcotte
published 3.5
3.15
Kristi Nault
published
3.11
David Tong
published 3.5
3.00
Sandy Pisano
published
2.79
Daphne Cole
published 3
2.68
Michelle Ha
published
Helen Hale
published
John Lee
published
Kristin Quackenbush
published
Lech Choroszucha
published
Michelle Farrar
published
Steven Larue
published
Verna Flemming
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andy Tucker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Kay Bransford
304W–204L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Jennifer DeCamp
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Julian Myers Benton
87W–85L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Paul Davis
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
Timothy DeCamp
26W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Kathleen Leary
160W–190L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
3
Kim Hovda
155W–110L career · no lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Elizabeth Marcotte
166W–175L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Kristi Nault
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
David Tong
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
Sandy Pisano
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Daphne Cole
20W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Michelle Ha
13W–25L career · no lines in 2023
0%10%90%
2.68
Helen Hale
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Lee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lech Choroszucha
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Farrar
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Larue
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Verna Flemming
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.