Teams

WI Adult 18&O 4.0M GML Paley Tennis Pulbello

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#3 DoublesCraig Fluegge / Luke Paulson vs Ken Crocker / Tim Putzer6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCullen White vs Jack Langenwalter6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNick Puibello / Steven Buccellato vs Steve Lyons / Jack Lyons6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCraig Fluegge / Luke Paulson vs Nicolas Sandoval / Benjamin Alban6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMichael Stanaszak / Justin Dorf vs Rick Vetter / Vaughan Joubert3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesCullen White vs Michael Korwin7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNick Puibello / Chris Urban vs Robert Fredrickson / Angelo Guillermo5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Ellenbecker / Steven Buccellato vs Maurice Russell / Bob Liebman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLuke Paulson / Craig Fluegge vs Justin Kirkpatrick / James Waltenberger6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNick Puibello / Luke Paulson vs Michael Griggs / David Weirick6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Cullen White
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.81
Michael Stanaszak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Craig Fluegge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brian Ellenbecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Chris Urban
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Luke Paulson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Nick Puibello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Buccellato
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Buccellato + Brian Ellenbecker16656% games−1.6% vs expected
Brian Ellenbecker + Michael Stanaszak4162% gamesnot enough data
Steven Buccellato + Nick Puibello404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Stanaszak + Nick Puibello224 matchesnot enough data
Chris Urban + Nick Puibello033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cullen White
18W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
4.20
Michael Stanaszak
33W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Craig Fluegge
32W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brian Ellenbecker
43W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Chris Urban
25W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Luke Paulson
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.64
Nick Puibello
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Buccellato
27W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.