Teams

Ivory Ridge-Rowland/Aubrey

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.5W

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/EwingLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesRebekah Aubrey / Esther Rowland vs Kathi Poggi / Allison Leishman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 Female DoublesCatherine Peterson / Kristin Kamerath vs Kadee Wolfgram / Haley H Moreno6-4, 0-3, 0-1
2023-11-28vs Sports Mall-Shoff/BrownLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesRebekah Aubrey / Esther Rowland vs Janee Roper / Esther Hatch3-6, 3-5
2023-11-14vs Sunpro-Parker/StringhamLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesCatherine Peterson / Kristin Kamerath vs Lindsey Ramage / TRACY PADGETT2-6, 2-6
2023-11-10vs Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/DagleyWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesEsther Rowland / Rebekah Aubrey vs Holly Miller / Jen Dagley6-4, 5-3
2023-10-31vs Sports Mall-England/RozsaSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesStephanie Sobotka / Cary Jones vs Porsche Gardner / Danna Miller6-1, 6-1
L#2 Female DoublesCatherine Peterson / Kristin Kamerath vs Lora Lyon / Lexi Farr6-7, 0-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Shoff/Brown602138115
2Liberty Park Tennis-Swensen/Sampson6016821161
3Sunpro-Parker/Stringham5116820172
4Salt Lake Tennis-Cracroft4215922182
5Sunpro-Westover/Hall42111329189
6Cottonwood Club-Annunziata3315923203
7Sports Mall-Lake/Knowlton3316824206
8Liberty Park Tennis-Handlon/Assemi33131128207
9Ivory Ridge-Adams3391531214
10Ivory Ridge-Rowland/Aubrey24101430205
11Ogden-Andersen2491533225
12Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Dagley2471736232
13Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/Ewing1581636240
14Sports Mall-England/Rozsa1571737238
15Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Chandromouli0671736237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cary Jones
published 3.5
Catherine Peterson
published 3.5
3.14
Penny McCord
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #3 Female Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Willes
published
3.13
Jennifer Elison
published 3.5
3.12
Stephanie Sobotka
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Chris Peterson
published 3.5
3.06
Rebekah Aubrey
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Kristin Kamerath
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Hardin
published
3.02
Esther Rowland
published
2.87
Jennifer Wily
usually #1 Female Doubles 43%, also #1 Female Singles 43% · published 3
Sara Jane Aubrey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Elison + Rebekah Aubrey4255% games+5.0% vs expected
Kristin Kamerath + Catherine Peterson5351% games+4.6% vs expected
Jennifer Hardin + Jennifer Elison293447% games+2.3% vs expected
Chris Peterson + Penny McCord171053% games+1.6% vs expected
Cary Jones + Stephanie Sobotka7945% games+0.2% vs expected
Jennifer Wily + Penny McCord141850% games−0.4% vs expected
Lisa Willes + Stephanie Sobotka212950% games−0.8% vs expected
Rebekah Aubrey + Sara Jane Aubrey6255% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cary Jones
39W–74L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Peterson
53W–90L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Penny McCord
132W–126L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Lisa Willes
58W–101L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jennifer Elison
36W–51L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Stephanie Sobotka
48W–85L career · 1 line in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Chris Peterson
76W–66L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Rebekah Aubrey
93W–109L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Kristin Kamerath
68W–104L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Hardin
71W–121L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
Esther Rowland
82W–121L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Jennifer Wily
119W–177L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Sara Jane Aubrey
24W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.