Teams

Advantage Us

Combo · 6.5 Female

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-14vs Nine Inch NailsWon 10
W#3 DoublesDolores Hoffman / Yvette Marietta vs Christy Putman / Holly Dutton6-2, 6-4
2025-09-14vs Nine Inch NailsWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Alexander / Brittney Corley vs Lauren Ratcliff / Holly Dutton6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPenny Digby / Tiffany Carter vs Shana Jeter / Tammy Laughlin1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Meyer / Amber Guevara vs Holly Smith / Beckie Taylor6-1, 6-1
2025-09-13vs Nine Inch NailsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRhonda Alexander / Stephanie Shaft vs Lauren Ratcliff / Holly Dutton2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMandy Hedderly / Brittney Corley vs Christy Putman / Holly Smith6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTiffany Carter / Melissa Meyer vs Shana Jeter / Beckie Taylor1-6, 2-6
2025-09-13vs Nine Inch NailsWon 30
W#1 DoublesRhonda Alexander / Brittney Corley vs Lauren Ratcliff / Holly Dutton6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Guevara / Melissa Meyer vs Shana Jeter / Tammy Laughlin6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIsabela Resendez / Mandy Hedderly vs Christy Putman / Holly Smith6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Female have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Amber Guevara
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Rhonda Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Brittney Corley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Yvette Marietta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Melissa Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Penny Digby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Dolores Hoffman
published 3
2.87
Isabela Resendez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Stephanie Shaft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Tiffany Carter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mandy Hedderly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Digby + Dolores Hoffman7746% games−2.0% vs expected
Brittney Corley + Melissa Meyer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amber Guevara
62W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Rhonda Alexander
85W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Brittney Corley
41W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Yvette Marietta
89W–62L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Melissa Meyer
42W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Penny Digby
60W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Dolores Hoffman
65W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Isabela Resendez
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
Stephanie Shaft
10W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Tiffany Carter
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Mandy Hedderly
22W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.